Quote: Superted "I've said it before, Child is one of those refs who suffers from having not played the game - little things like when a ball comes flying out of a stationary tackle, where the ball comes out obviously travelling too fast for it to have just been dropped, yet he'll give knock on when all sense says it was reefed.
He's also got a real sense of arrogance around him. The way he holds himself and talks 'at' players, coupled with his sometimes bizarre decisions means players get frustrated with him (which the players should handle better). All of this means that inevitably, he has far too much involvement in a game, rather than being like the better refs who try to remain out of the spotlight as a facilitator of the game taking place rather than a centre stage if the game.'"
I think it's a problem with RL refs in general. Not necessarily having played the game, I don't think that's necessary to be a decent ref. But I do think the refs live in their own little refereeing world and that a culture exists whereby the ref is always right.
Now I can understand how that's come about. Our refs go through the amateur game, which is a terrible place to be a referee. The verbal and sometimes physical abuse they still suffer is appalling and I wonder if the necessity to "stand up" to often intimidating players, officials, coaches and fans in the amateur game means that the few who make it through to SL have an almost in-built "arrogance" in the way they communicate with players.
Personally I think a few things could be done that would drastically improve the reffing:
- increase the money and support available to amateur refs
- stamp out the abuse of referees in the amateur game with long bans for players, coaches, officials & fans/parents who abuse referees. Including kicking repeat offender clubs out of competitions.
- increase the amount of time referees spend in League 1 before moving to the Championship and the same up to SL. I'd say at least 5 years in League 1 followed by at least 5 years in the Championship.
- increase the wages of referees to encourage better candidates.
- review whether exclusively full time refs is necessary. Could there be both full time and part time refs?
- introduce a 2nd ref. Not in the NRL style though I don't think that's needed. It'd be more like a roving touch judge.
I know these thing basically all require more money being spent on the refs but I think, like most RL departments, it's underfunded.