Quote: Gotcha "
Excuse me, but I really don't have time for silly arguments.
Nantwichexile, whom I have no problem with whatsover posted that from the squad list it confirmed that BJB would have to wait for his overdue run out.
I asked a simple question "Is this not just squad number order"? Where is the pedantic or unreasonable level of questioning?'"
Utter bo[ill[/iocks and you know it is.
Firstly.... NOBODY has time to post on a forum, but not time to "argue". There's no necessity to comment on here at all. Nobody is counting how many times a day you post. If you've got time to write the post, then you've got time to argue. If you haven't got time to [whatever] just don't come on here and post at all. This is a leisure activity, not a mandatory requirement. Starting a post by effectively saying, "I haven't got time to post" is just a stupid notion.
Secondly.... Nantwichexile never EVER said it was CONFIRMED that BJB would [etc] as you've just stated. Luckily, we have the ability to re-read what Nantwichexile actually put, thus proving you're talking your usual bo[ill[/iocks.
Nantwichexile simply said...
Quote: Gotcha "looks like BJB will have to wait a little longer for his overdue extended run at FB'"
Which is a totally legitimate statement, because if Mac has a preference for playing Sinnie at 6, then it does look like BJB will have to wait a little longer for his overdue extended run at FB.
Your pedantic and unreasonable level of questioning comes not in your "is that the squad no. order" post, but in the post afterwards.
Quote: Gotcha "I have not seen anything saying Webb will be the starting fullback. Of course he might well and possibly will be, just not seen it confirmed that BJB won't be fullback.'"
You know that's pedantic. That's the definition of pedantic. "It doesn't specifically say that Webb will be playing FB? What's making you assume he is?"
Basically what happened is you didn't read my original post properly, which NE then picked you up on, but instead of saying... "Oops you're right! Sorry I didn't read that properly!" you went down the route of creating a completely bo[ill[/iocks argument to try and justify your completely bo[ill[/iocks post.
Anyway, seen as you "don't have time" we can both just leave it at that.
