Im sure thats down to the individual player than a club policy though.

Yeah remembered then edited my post.

You see it every week on Sky, as soon as a player gets injured he gets withdrawn and assessed from the touchline or in changing room. Whereas with Leeds he has to be practically unconscious or crying in pain to warrant a sub to be used.

Most players and clubs are the same.

I don't think it's really a critisism that can only be levelled against Leeds or it's players.

It did remind me of the Toopi one on the same ground though.



I don't think you do. Coaches have to be a bit more circumspect with their use of substitutes than that.

That might well be the case tvoc, but should the club learn from the lessons of this season? or continue to operate the same?

I would hope lessons are learned and players health is not compromised if any risk.

Life's a risk. Playing rugby league much more so.

When Burrow (for example)gets knocked unconscious and is left out there to get on with it I'll accept the club's negligence towards the welfare of the players but until then.

Realised I am a bit late! All the best to the lad! it took disco from his injury to the back end of 07 to look anything other than a passenger.

I think it depends on the injury and circumstances but generally players play with a lot of niggling injuries or ones that they run off. If you substituted everyone who got a knock then you would be unable to make tactical substitutions. I don't think Leeds have done anything wrong, they have just been rather unlucky.

I once played on 3 broken legs.

very funny.

Didddle-iddle-iddle-um.

I don't think that was suggested tvoc. But someone hobbling around limping in obvious pain, should take a little more consideration.

How would you interpret



I dont think this happens and I don't think this happens either.

Ah tvoc, on the Red text - well thats your opinion but I think other teams seem to a be more cautious than what Leeds are when it comes to an injury imo.

On the brown text I was been a little sarky dont you think? But Sinfield, Delaney and Watkins had to be unable to run to be sub'd on their injuries. They were left to run the injuries off and made them worse, all 3 could hardly walk off the pitch.

You're seriously suggesting Leeds are risking player's health?



I'm just wondering what makes you think you can assess a player's injury (or extent thereof) better than the professional medical staff employed by the club and dealing with the on field incidents?