It's a serious question and one that will need addressing sooner or later.

Diskin nor Buderus are what you'd term impact hookers. Buderus is clearly the better option to start, which leaves Diskin where?

In the seventeen in a different role - interchange second row

or ?

Is it not more about the team than the player?

Serious quesions here. Have we looked anything like any good with using both Buderus and Diskin in the same squad?

Did we not play our best Rugby of the season without Diskin in the squad?

Did we not win two championships without the two hookers scenario?

Was not the last time we looked so poor around the ruck area, when we went with a Diskin/Millard combination. Coincidentally the two hookers.

Some match reports have Keith scoring a goal kick with Sinny getting 7, but others have Sinfield with all 8 kicks. What happened?

mmmm...

Sinfield kicked eight from eight. Burrow missed one from one.

The YEP online had Senior kicking the goal after the Webb try.

[iOn 48 minutes, Webb went on a run and fed Lauitiiti, who slipped out a wonderful offload round the man to Keith Senior. He made ground then turned the ball to the supporting Webb to complete a classic try, converted by Senior.[/i

Very strange.

Has Ray French been writing for the YEP again?

7 goals kicked by Keith Sinfield and 1 by Kevin Senior

It come up saying that on sky sports when it came up on the screen the morning after

Not a patch on his confusion over Anthony and Andy Farrell.

Anyone who can get those two muddled up needs to retire to the nursing home.

I'm a big fan of Diskin and was not keen on giving the No9 shirt to Buderus
but seeing how the season has progressed Buderus is in a different league and can play 80mins no problem, it pains me to say it but having Diskin on the bench is wasting a space that could be taken by someone who we could use to change a game plan if things went wrong, as you say he's not a Roby and would only be good as cover for an injury to Buderus.

I agree with every word and unfortunately I'm sure the Leeds management knew what they were getting when they made the signing last March making all the two hooker rotation within the game talk disingenuous (if that's the right word.)

He's back again tonight. Rob Burrow is now in a battle for the England number 7 shirt with someone called rlRob Mylerrl.

I think in our current squad Diskin as a utility forward can be included on the bench. However, with 2 more spaces that many believe we have on the cap, he would struggle to get gametime, and if we go with 2 hookers, young mcshane could get an appearace or two

Utility forward? His he really a better back row option than some of our other fringe players? Like Allan for example?

I don't know. But he offers little different in style to Buderus, and certainly not in ability, but he does have good defense and almost 10 years of SL experience. I would say he would get into the 17 on that above Allan or Worral

Neither of which would probably feature in a fully fit Leeds seventeen this season. 1 to 13 squad number then 16, 17, 18 , 19 making the seventeen.

Leaving Diskin as 18th man and cover for Buderus?