I do wonder if in light of recent favourable results we are hoping to fudge it with Piroe and Joseph till the end of the season with possibly just a loan signing coming in when all the transfer activity has died down and we can see what’s left. We are in a real tricky position at the moment, we don’t have a decent striker at the club, but are we going to risk spending money on a temporary fix that ultimately wouldn’t be good enough if we make it to the promised land. We currently have Piroe that wouldn’t play in the PL, and unless Joseph’s career takes on a remarkable upward trajectory he wouldn’t feature either. Would we risk adding a third striker not fit for purpose just to get us over the line ? It’s looking more and more like a loan signing as back up rather than a de facto match winner that simply wouldn’t be available.

piroe would be good off the bench in a premier league side but never a starter.
I could see him scoring a few off the bench

Hull City now getting in on the act signing Louie Barry on loan.
Personally I think him and Buendia would have been great loan signings.
Trouble is Farke won`t guarantee they get many minutes which I`m sure must put the loaning clubs off.

we were never ever getting buendia.
doesn't barry play wide? we have 4 good players there.
we need a 9. the rest we can manage.
I can only hope it's the 49rs doing what they do, conducting business quietly

thought gruev could start tonight

awful game. great point.
sloppiness cost us. it was there for us

oh, and we are desperate for a 9. if that game doesn't ram it home nothing will

Good point away at a direct promotion rival. Extended the lead at the top.

Yep, need a better 9. Piroe isn’t effective in games like that. Too easy to defend

You would not want to play Burnley in the play offs - if they scored game over. Their defence is so strong. Only having one shot on target doesn't help matters either.

Meslier still looks very shaky at times.

Burnley could be the new Ipswich.
They were very lucky against Sunderland who outplayed them for much of the game similar to us to some extent.
I`ve seen them in another couple of games and thought they were nothing to write home about.
But with a defence that has only conceded 9 goals they`re doing something right.
Whereas Ipswich conceded for fun and whilst we waited for them to implode they got over the line which might be the case with Burnley who bore the opposition to death.

I think we would all have taken a point beforehand. I think that’s why Farke went with Gruev and Tanaka. Having seen Burnley’s lack of ambition, I’m beginning to think it’s two points dropped tbh. Unfortunately for us Solomon didn’t work as an inverted winger last night, and as for Piroe…..no, no, and thrice no. He only has one goal in the last 6 games, constantly gives the ball away, doesn’t tackle, doesn’t win anything in the air…what on Earth is he doing on the field ? He is an absolute liability to the team. M.O.M for me was Rodon, defended well and was the only player from the centre of the field that was actually prepared to carry the ball forward into space and look to penetrate down the middle. Tanaka/Gruev will work when you’re happy to settle for a point but it’s not a combination when you’re looking to go at teams. Anyway, we’re two points clear at the top, let’s hope Farke has taken things from last night and can fine tune us for the run in.

Not at our best last night, too many sloppy passes and giving the ball away too easy, especially in the first half, think Ampadu gave the ball away about 4 times.