If Fusitua on Litten was fair, think we just nee to accept that the Currie tackle was too…..

You jump around a bit don't you from 'the games being ruined " then to this. Fusitu’a didn't make contact with littens chin though?

My thoughts too Holmes and those incidents against Catalans in 2020 don't really do Kendall any favours do they?

4 matches now great start to his Leeds career .

Got exactly what we deserved for appealing that. Absolutely crazy.

Wire appealing oliver Holmes ban too, another increase?

100% agree don't understand the logic it was definitely a three match red card and we clearly have a very poor relationship with the disciplinary panel

We're getting laughed at all over the other RL sites . They really love us dont they

Appealing after he pleaded guilty too lol. Yep he got increased to 2 games.

While its a bit daft to appeal an obvious ban like Bentley, the panel needs to avoid giving the impression that any appeal could lead to an increase. An increase is either an admission they were wrong in the first penalty, and/or a punitive response for daring to ask them to review a decision. Appealing a ban ought to be a perfectly reasonable thing to do if you think you've got a case - the default outcome of appeals ought to be no change. To stop spurious appeals make the appealing club pay costs if the ban is upheld/increased.

Its clear the club has decided that the usual route of quietly talking to the RFL behind the scenes just isn't working. Using the YEP is a nuclear option and I really hope they thought there was no other choice. If the RFL keep picking Kendall for Leeds games he'll be under enormous pressure, and if they don't it will look like they've caved, or even worse accepted some truth to the clearly implied view that Kendall is biased against Leeds.

This does need to get sorted out. For whatever reason one of the SL clubs has lost faith in the disciplinary system. That is not good for the sport.

Can we appeal against the ban being extended?

No.

On another issue and probably a more important point. How the hell did Leeds' medical staff and coaches deem it ok for Fusitua to play on for around 20 minutes when everyone in the stadium could see he had concussion like symptons? He was doubling up, behind play, looked unstable and couldnt hold the ball. It was clear he wasnt right yet they let him stay out there.

In times where we talk about player welfare Leeds need to fully investigate how that happened and ensure it never happens again. Players safety and well being should be the priority above everything.

Leeds should know much better after Rob and Stevie Ward. The medical staff are there to save the players from themselves. Disgusting.

Absolute insanity.
Got exactly what we deserve.
I thought 3 was pretty fortunate.

Maybe we thought 3 was too generous and appealed to get it extended....

What do you mean? I thought both were brutal but fair tackles ……
I want less cards and bans, Unless clear foul play involved…..

Does my memory not serve me well or did sin bins ever used to result in a ban? Unless in the circumstance where further information comes to light it seems a contradiction to giving a yellow in the first place 'right I'm giving you 10 minutes now, then you can play out again, but then you need to sit out another 80.' seems bonkers to me?