Who cost's the business the most money?

Who has made the business the most money?

Translation I've had my ar5e handed to me.

Probably Diskin on both. Certainly on the 2nd one.

I do not need to defend myself ...certainly against those who are ignorant of how to use an apostrophe or who resort to pureile co attempts at humour ....so I won't

Business has to be fluid to maintain success. If somebody costs a lot of money it expects performance. If somebody has made the company money in the past it rightly expects that to continue. It remains a business never a charity.

As others have quite eloquently stated: let's stop making this a pi55ing contest and deal in the facts.

Buderus deserves his place because he is the better distributer; better passer of the ball; better at running selectively from dummy half and is the better at tackling.

Diskin apparently deserves his place because he is better for team moral (presumably even if the team loses owing to his lesser skills) and has been part of an amazingly successful (not unappreciated) run for Leeds in the past.

From the perspective of an impartial onlooker ....not a fanatical desire to be "one of the lads" or having a misguided loyalty to someone they think cares two hoots about he or she.....which makes more sense ?

As for McShane: whether he has the ability to make the grade might be questionable (although the Hull FC fans seem to rate him highly enough.) but how long before he decides he has exhausted his patience ? Does he not deserve to be at least second only to one other next season ? On present merit that looks like Buderus. Maybe he hasn't yet won "man of match" with Leeds...but until he is given an extended run in his rich present vein of form for the whole match that ccould continue to evade him

If McShane fails the test there will be other options if Diskin is no longer with the club ...what's Lunt's present contract situation ? Doesn't Sinfield get picked for his country to play hooker ??

Good times the club has HAD ....the skill is to maintain that without over thanking present staff.

Further; all those who maintain they have unquestioning faith in the present management / coaching staff with the persistence in accommodating Diskin ....is this not the same set-up that courted and brought over Buderus in the first place ? Do you really consider he was added to the squad as an "expensive luxury" ? Do you still have that same unquestioning faith in THAT decision ? Or is it possible they sometimes get it wrong ?

]Maybe he hasn't yet won "man of match" with Leeds...but until he is given an extended run in his rich present vein of form for the whole match that could continue to evade him

I meant Buderus of course.

If McShane fails the test there will be other options if Diskin is no longer with the club ...what's Lunt's present contract situation ? Doesn't Sinfield get picked for his country to play hooker ??
]

]

Quote: man of match "As an outsider, but an RL fan.
I watched him closely in the U20 game v Wigan and he was completely outplayed by a 17 year old Logan Tomkins, but I guess that's another debate.

It wouldn't surprise me to see Mickey McIlorum heading back to Leeds at some stage and maybe sooner rather than later. he is very much like Diskin in the way he plays the game.'"

]

One game is not enough to judge too critically, but interesting.

However, it does further highlight there would always be other options if Diskin was (sad though it might be) to leave.

Quote: Andy Gilder "Or alternatively, keep people based on an objective opinion of their performance.

Damn, I forgot. Only your opinion (and those of your comedy creations) is relevant. How silly of me.'"

The penny drops. I'm guessing Magic Wand must have a history of aliases....well that will better allow me to excuse the abuse I've had to take from some for daring to stick my head above the parapet.

I assure you I am not Magic Wand.

You couldn't write this.

Comes on correcting people on their English language yet cannot spell puerile and fails to add a full stop at the end of the sentence.

Congratulations. You are 'Gomper of the Week'.


Oh and to cap it all off you're too stupid to use the quote function correctly.

Quote: Puig-Aubert "And spelling morale without the 'e' on the end. Actually that was quite a giveaway too.

He's about as effective as a marzipan dildo.'"

Have you really nothing better to do ?? I really can't believe you would bother to go to so much trouble to highlight something like this.....even if I was Magic Wand. Gosh you guys are so tedious and need to get a life. You're all welcome to these juvenile exchanges.

For those with some semblance of 'a life' ....I'm sure you would forgive me for no longer getting embroiled in this petty nonsense and allow me to now bow out with some dignity.

Hummm - now there's an idea!