Wigan 7 players cited, only 1 charged and then no ban given. And we have 2 banned and one out for an HiA after an unpunished head shot. RFL disciplinary not fit for purpose, corrupt.

Have I logged onto the wakey board by mistake?

Shocking calls on Currie and Dwyer

is kenneth williams shouting infamy somewhere

Dwyer the only one on a charge A to get a ban whilst all others got no bans.
Holmes charge B and got 1 game same as Dwyer and Currie nothing even though Fusitua has suffered concussion.
Bentley on the other hand is lucky imo.

Is Dwyer based on past record or something?

Maybe but don`t recall what his past record`s like.
Think we should appeal it.

Dwyer tackle =
Possible whiplash =
Possible future dementia =
Sue Rugby football league=
Player protection
Change of rules=
1 match ban.

Players have got to get it into their heads these are the rules.

Bentley and Dylan Napa belong to Rugby League from 25 years ago when there was room for being an enforcer followed by a bit of biff. Even then I’d like to see them mix it with Morley, Farrell, Sculthorpe and co. Only 1 winner I think.

Curries tackle is ball and all.
Fusitua has his feet planted facing an onrushing defence. The kick hangs in the air. What do you expect Currie to do, pull out.
Fusitua needs to get in the air and force an illegal tackle. Currie then either pulls out or gets red carded.

The difference is this incident happens with the players facing each other, tensed expecting collision.
The Dwyer incident he hits from behind with Widdop not expecting it. He’s got to wrap his arms around like Currie.

I agree both tackles can cause the same injury, but they are the rules.
I’ll put it another way round is Fusitua makes the same tackle on Currie, this board thinks what a great tackle.

Fair explanation.
Not sure Fusitua was that tensed expecting the collision and Dwyers was a split second out.
Widdop holds that pass a split second longer and it`s a fair tackle.
All ifs buts and maybes I suppose.

There's no ownership on fus to do anything. You make shoulder contact with the head regardless of mitigation and there's a consequence.

I agree there’s no ownership on Fusitua to do anything but then he’s got to expect collision. Currie hits him with everything but his arms are wrapped around him. It’s not a blatant shoulder charge. This leads to grade A (careless) rather than Grade D (blatant- Napa)

Does that not carry a ban then? Yeah expect collision around his body. Surely there's due care on the tackler to not hit his heat with anything.

Last comment on this.
If your arms make contact between midriff and chest where do you expect the shoulder to be. Not around the players ankles, but between neck and chin.
He got careless verdict Grade A with no matches.
The panel are warning him to go lower or next time expect ban for same grade.
They state it as high contact with no malice.