I think it’s 2 wins out of 11, a win rate of 18%. I was not there on Saturday and have not seen the game. So I’m not saying this based on the wire game but what I saw last year, but I think Kendall may have a bias against Leeds. I don’t believe he is doing it on purpose and if it’s there is an unconscious bias.

It may just be we are getting on the wrong end of incompetence and in time the luck will change, however it’s pushing against the law of averages at the moment for mine.

I'm struggling to understand how they've deemed that Dwyer's sin binned tackle is worthy of further punishment, but Currie knocking Fusitua out isn't.

That it was accidental is surely neither here nor there - Dwyer didn't mean to tackle late but he got ten minutes and now a match ban. Fact is that Currie hit Fusitua in the head with his shoulder - that's his fault as it's his shoulder and his responsibility to make sure he doesn't knock people out. As a result we lost our winger for the second half and the next match, we didn't even get a penalty and Currie is free to carry on.

They're either serious about player welfare or they're not. This sends out the message that they're not particularly.

It was 2 wins out of 11 from 2020 onwards. In 2019 he allegedly refereed us 7 times and we lost all 7.

I think we have clearly upset him and now do not get any 50:50 calls. I'm sure we had similar when we publicly criticised Silverwood following the final with Bulls. I don't think Kendall goes out to intentionally penalise Leeds but subconsciously, I think there is an issue.

Leeds just have to learn to be extra clean when playing with Kendall and hopefully in time, he will think higher of Leeds and give us a fairer share of calls.

Kendall is a big Hudds Town fan and when they were in the premiership and Leeds Utd in Div 1 he had regular digs with his petty Marchings gone forever social media posts. So while a different sport he prob thinks very little of us either.

Wigan 7 players cited, only 1 charged and then no ban given. And we have 2 banned and one out for an HiA after an unpunished head shot. RFL disciplinary not fit for purpose, corrupt.

Have I logged onto the wakey board by mistake?

Shocking calls on Currie and Dwyer

is kenneth williams shouting infamy somewhere

Dwyer the only one on a charge A to get a ban whilst all others got no bans.
Holmes charge B and got 1 game same as Dwyer and Currie nothing even though Fusitua has suffered concussion.
Bentley on the other hand is lucky imo.

Is Dwyer based on past record or something?

Maybe but don`t recall what his past record`s like.
Think we should appeal it.

Dwyer tackle =
Possible whiplash =
Possible future dementia =
Sue Rugby football league=
Player protection
Change of rules=
1 match ban.

Players have got to get it into their heads these are the rules.

Bentley and Dylan Napa belong to Rugby League from 25 years ago when there was room for being an enforcer followed by a bit of biff. Even then I’d like to see them mix it with Morley, Farrell, Sculthorpe and co. Only 1 winner I think.

Curries tackle is ball and all.
Fusitua has his feet planted facing an onrushing defence. The kick hangs in the air. What do you expect Currie to do, pull out.
Fusitua needs to get in the air and force an illegal tackle. Currie then either pulls out or gets red carded.

The difference is this incident happens with the players facing each other, tensed expecting collision.
The Dwyer incident he hits from behind with Widdop not expecting it. He’s got to wrap his arms around like Currie.

I agree both tackles can cause the same injury, but they are the rules.
I’ll put it another way round is Fusitua makes the same tackle on Currie, this board thinks what a great tackle.