Nah...we've got a long list of MUCH better grievances with you lot (and the relevant officials) than that! I believe Penguin published them in paperback in several volumes a year or two ago. Let's start with the Scumster red-carding Penguin for...well no case to answer against Cocky Smith, then the alleged Withers knock on, then move on to....

Bradley deserved sending off in every match not just his final one and Withers clearly knocked on.

dont take this personally but shut up damo you fool.

definitely not. They have a good record at headingley, and there'd then be the expectation that you'd already beaten the 2nd best team before the grand final, so should hammer whoever you play.

Personally i think we'll get the opportunity to pick Cas, and should do so.

I wouldn't like to play Wigan at Old Trafford, so if there around at the semis, we must pick them.

2007?

It wasn't raining in the 2007 gf.

WARNING WARNING

YET ANOTHER CLUELESS SAINTS FAN

No suprises there

They're all clueless

You’ve got the wrong end of the stick here Danny – what he’s saying is that ‘if there is weather (of any description) then Saints are likely to lose’.

Which is factually accurate.

No. We like sunny weather. We don't play well in the dark or the rain.

This season is complicated by the eye injury to Longy. Saints have requested that OT dim the bulbs whenever the ball approaches Long, it's not fair otherwise.

What was the weather like on the 4th September at Headingley?

Fortunately for St Helens it was neither of the above. Unfortunately for St Helens it didn't affect the result.

That's not me, it's snake eater.

It was dark.

eerm., Friday 23rd July 2004 was a warm and sunny summer evening.

Your lot scored ...... nil points

whilst we, rather unsportingly scored seventy.

What are you like in a snowstorm?