bit.ly/1c42p7o brough saying there player was biten not zak having a laugh

bit.ly/1c42p7o brough saying there player was biten not zak having a laugh

Brilliant, Brough trying to turn tables after Conner is called out on social media. Pathetic from the Gaints. Should be funny to see what comes out of this. Gaints fans have already said there was no bite in the incident (in their opinion). Let's see if they do a massive 180.

and we have all said that if there was a bite then jake should be looking at a long ban, but there simply isn't enough evidence out there, on still or moving pictures to conclusively show there was a bite.

obviously the MRP will have different camera angles etc to be able to make that decision.

After Jake is called out on social media? What a thread on rlfans I doubt very much the "giants" are bothered about unsubstantiated claims from fans on here.
As I've already said if jake bit someone, he should be banned. The panel will look at it and make a decision regardless of what anyone on "social media" thinks.

Looking very "tasty" when the Giants and Brough come to HQ soon

100% right and Conner blatantly does something to Zak that fires him up. If you take the time to look at 79:20 on the sky clock Conner (to my eyes) bites Hardaker.

The Brough story is some poor attempt at a cover up.

Social media did not get lip readers in- the RFL did. How do you know there was no evidence whatsoever? Do you work for the RFL? Did you see the match report
he's been sent home by the england management, banned for a homophobic comment directed at a referee, and admitted assaulting a student (after the lipreader was brought in) all those things following many Leeds fans complaining trial by social media
(Still - at least the anger management course seems to be working.... )

The irony on here is ridiculous- give it the hardaker was badly done to, trial by social media rubbish, then do exactly the same for a player from another club

IF Jake has bitten anyone I condemn that completely and he should get a lengthy ban. I'd expect the same to happen for any other player that bites another- whichever club they play for. Previous similar incidents have been awarded 5-6 matches, perhaps it should be more.

Just a couple of things. At no time what's so ever was he sent home by the England management. Why some people still cant seem to cotton on to this despite MCNamara and Hardaker both saying the same story.

Nor has he admitted assaulting a student. He has accepted been involved in an incident with a student and given him compensation to make it go away.

He may have got banned for an homophobic comment, and because the referee was offended, however anyone with half a brain knows the comment wasn't made at the ref, and was at Monaghan.

Don`t talk a load of crap, that was a perfectly legal dump into touch by a good defence. It was only because the ref called held which wasn`t heard that it was penalty. And why should Silverwood shout held when it was clear where he was going when only a couple of metres off the touchline. Just another example of Silverwood trying to find ways of getting Leeds back into the game.

Doesn't matter who it was aimed at, it was a homophobic slur.

But yet he came home, - perhaps he just decided he didn't want to play for england???? Or perhaps they tried to do the best by him. he'd been out drinking but claims he didn't think he was doing anything wrong, he admitted he'd let everyone down and the club reprimanded and fined him-whilst McNamara dithered.
The police were quoted as saying they had both admitted the assault when they were helping with enquiries.
Oh that's ok then - as long as it was only another player. And only hardaker really knows who the comment was actually made towards.

It does matter, but that is irrelevant. The point was Jools was wrong, as in a few of his points highlighted.

Perhaps the RFL should bring in the lipreaders to look at Paul Anderson - almost as bad as Wane !