Quote tvoc="tvoc"It's not the Bradford player's fault either that the club has been financially miss-managed over a lengthy period. Unless Bradford have exceeded the salary cap - and I'm not aware that they have this season - Bradford's results earned them 7th and Wakefield's results earned them 9th - a great effort as many predicted a fight with Widnes for the wooden spoon rather than a shot at making the play-offs.
That said Wakefield's on field performances earned them 9th and =#BFFF00it's not really credible to dispute that fact.'"
Ok I'll try though, the Bulls put together a side (one assumes at the top end of the SC or close to it) knowing full well that they couldn't afford it.
They budgeted to lose £100k per month or £1.2m over the year.
What they could or should have done was budget correctly, that would obviously left little for a star studded squad I grant you but none the less it would have been prudent.
This would have been appreciated by both the HMRC and the other creditors. It would have no doubt been appreciated by the staff made redundant and who knows in hindsight the fans too.
It would have also stopped the RFL from making yet another mess of things.
Had the bulls done the prudent thing they would not have been at risk of relegation, who knows some cracking youngsters could have been unearthed? Two things are for certain though, one is that they would have no doubt finished in the bottom place in SL and another is that once again SL wouldn't be making headlines for all the wrong reasons again.
I personally don't think it would be credible to dispute those facts.