I can't answer your question, but what I can tell you with some degree of certainty is that there are a number of people with a working grasp of English grammar.

Sadly, it doesn't appear that you are one of them.

If you're working so hard to set yourself up as intellectually superior to others it's always good to proof read your posts before hitting submit.

HTH.

Andy
Can you not quote him please. I've got him on ignore and quoting him sort of scuppers my trying to stay awake.

Aw bless

15 at last count.

Not 17. Not 20.

But 15.

HTH

Gareth
My point to Andy refers to you also.

Do me a favour and don't quote the gomper.

BTW, he works in a coffee shop

Forgive me if I am giving you the impression that I am some sort of interlectual, that was not my intention. The problem is that when you are dealing with an idiot of the highest order perhaps thats the way its perceived, who knows who really cares. As a matter of interest can you just enlighten me as to what it is grammatically that I have upset you with, assuming its not too much trouble. Thanks in advance.

I see that you havent quite perfected the art of selective misquoting just yet. I am sure with time and practice you will achieve this hth

Thanks for the education, no seriously I'd like to think its been fun

Head High, don't read this. Wouldn't want to upset you.



You used the apostrophe at the end of scientists which you were expressing as a plural. The apostrophe only comes in to indicate ownership, e.g. the rocket scientists' lab coats.

The second sentence went on to pose a question, but was completed with a full stop rather than a question mark.

Small points, but accuracy costs nothing.

I did tell you not to read it...