I deserve 2 points for the Ganson comment . Even the hardened of Rhino fan must say the game struggled to recover from that padantic t*at in orange .

You seemed to have miss read me there. Im not saying it may have favoured us. Im saying it would have certainly favoured the 15000 people that were watching that game because the ref killed it as a spectacle in that first 20minutes of sheer sh*te refing.

He didnt spoil it for me last night,,,although when he starts "inventing" rules I do get a bit frustrated.

I think for the first 20 minutes he forgot it wasnt on Sky and that the audience love to watch HIM.

assuming he is found guilty first

Phil Bailey and he deserved the accidental contact.

I agree, if only for that crime against humanity that he committed in the 1980's with Phil Collins, they both should have been locked up for a very long time.

Why?

When you hold down and mess around in the tackle (instead of rolling away as the law dictates) you're liable to get caught up with the player attempting to regain his feet to play the ball.

So he deserved a kick in the face (potentially causing facial injuries) because he held a player down for longer than he should? You're pathetic.

& That's usually caused because the players have got fed up with the ref not taking action so they take the law into their own hands.

That is quite clearly not what he is suggesting. The point is that when there is two players in close proximity like during a tackle the potential for accidental contact is significantly increased.

The contact was accidental as a result of Smith trying to get to his feet. Not deliberate in any way and no intent to cause any injury to Bailey. Smith doesn't look behind him and does not know position of Bailey's head when trying to get to feet.



Without Bailey and Collins Easy Lover we may never have had Fur Q's Uzi Lover though.