Quote: ThePrinter "Ahh good old Smokey, can't think of an intelligent reply to the point made so reverts back to shouting homophobe and bigot in the hope people won't realise he couldn't think of a counter argument.'"
Everyone is well aware of what the counter argument to your bigoted and homophobic statement is.
Quote: ThePrinter "But that's not what you said, you claimed that by attacking James Child we are attacking ALL gay people in ANY job. To claim that questioning one gay persons employment is to question every gay persons employment is stupid.
'"
dont be a liar as well as a coward and a bigot. What i said, again, Verbatim
Quote: ThePrinter "
It isnt fair on James Child, and it isnt fair on any gay person who may wish to referee.
You are basically arguing that it is fine to speculate that any gay person, in any role, is possibly only there based on their sexuality. That we should assume that they may only be there because of their sexuality.
'"
Quote: ThePrinter "Yes I know "jobs for the boys" is something completely different because not every person will be positively discriminated for the same reason. One case might be because of someone's sexuality, one might be "jobs for the boys", one might be skin colour, one might be gender. To say I need to include sexuality in every case of discrimination whether negative or positive is showing your complete lack of understanding on the matter.'"
m.hulldailymail.co.uk/Hull-KR-ve ... story.html
www.skysports.com/rugby-league/n ... om-actions
That Tim Roby?
Yeah Child getingt those games over him because he is gay is definitely the conclusion of a rational non homophobic person.
