Just seems odd that we would have so much available at this point.

Rumours are what make the board interesting - there are very few on here who post maliciously.

RL is a very small community and rumours will always be an important part of promoting interest in the sport.

Leeds are a very inclusive club and that is part of its charm - the fact club officials are prepared to be reasonably open is to applauded and they should not be castigated for this approach.

The club want to sell season tickets and the club want to be seen to doing all it can to improve the product on offer - talking to customers about the vision for the future is all part of that.

There are things I would like the management to do differently but on the whole no fan could complain about the effort and effectiveness of GH and his team.

You're just continuing to make stuff up.

None of that happened.

Great post!

Yeah, your very lucky the posts don't go back that far. Doesn't mean your not telling a complete lie though. I mean we are going back 12 years here. It totally happened, and as said where your crush started on me.

Looks like we can file Westerman with Morley, Ellis etc as in Leeds wanted them but not prepared to pay more than another club, certainly not a bad thing imo.

I'm lucky?

You're lucky the Phil Daly thread isn't around because there's concrete proof that you tell lies for any recent posters who don't remember that hilarity.

Like when you lied about your critique of Jimmy Keinhorst, before Seth dug up the thread and showed you up?

...and as we know, you sometimes make mistakes about who it was you were talking to the night before so I will say again, perhaps you have mistaken me for another poster or you are, yet again, just making stuff up.

Look, by all means post rumours. They're good and they're the lifeblood of the board like Sal says.

But if you try and give those rumours, and by extension yourself, added credibility by claiming you're "in the know" then you are making your credibility part of the discussion rather than just the rumour.

And as well all know, when it comes to credibility, you have none. Phil Daly told me. At least I think it was him.

True. But whilst some rumours are believable, some aren't. When one poster in this instance used such rumours to criticise posters and fans for praising the way the club treats players and basically say it's a lie then it's going to come under the microscope. Especially when people make valid counter points to why they don't believe the rumour and usually the rumour spreader snaps back along the lines of "but it is true, because I said so"

I really want to believe that the Burgess deal is a goer. All has gone very quiet and Sam has hardly put the rumours to bed

Just thought you would want to know but Clark moved to the Warrington area when he signed for Wire. No Chauffer required

That's because it's Wires Year

I thought that from what I've seen on the Wire board previously. Add to it his tweet a few days ago saying "Yorkshire bound for the weekend"......which would be a very strange thing to write if he still lived here. But I'm not "in the know" so feared being shot down.

[i"I moved over but they’re all still over there in Cas"[/i

rlhttps://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/jul/25/warrington-daryl-clark-castleford-rugby-leaguerl

Clark must be lying because.....

"Clarke has lost his driving licence, and one of the major reasons in his desire to be back over here. Westerman is effectively to be his chauffeur at Warrington and a major reason on why they would pay the deal Hull wanted."