Agreed... the right centre is a real week point for the team. Bridge did ok when he wasn't giving silly pens away.. but we need to find someone for that position and given him games to get up to speed.. it's no use chopping and changing so much with players who are in expierienced in that role.

Wow is this thread still going?

Clearly the fact that Sinfield has been moved to play at 9 shows how bang on the money I have been all along.

Sinfield has never and never will be a International Number 13 - its great to see how many people now agree, including Tony Smith and Brian Noble, two people who clearly know there onion.

PS

Ramrod (and remember this folks) is considerably more intelligent and richer than yaw!!

I can't be d looking so i'm sure you will post a link to where you stated this.

He's back!!!

I take it someones lifted up your rock to give you some fresh air!!!

I've been away for a few days but yes I am indeed back to bring this board back in line, I've only been away a short time but clearly the usual gang have been blowing bubbles up Sinfields rear end.

Having said that it has taken a move to another position to prove that he is indeed a very poor 13 although a slightly better 9 than Moore at International level!!

Who are you kidding? You have constantly slated Sinfield as a player and have been proven 100% wrong. Now you seek to make out all you said was he was not an international 13. Don't quote Noble & Smith as agreeing with you as they both are on record as recognising Sinfield as one of the great 13's. You still don't get it do you Sinfield has the class and ability to play for his country at 13, 6 and now 9. For half the game on Saturday he was back at 13 and in the previous match against Australia he played a key role at 6.

What he has proved the unenlightened like yourself is that whatever number he has on his back he can run the whole show against the best in the world. It has taken the move to distributing at acting half, where he has had more of the ball and so was more obvious, to convert you one eyed fans that can only relate to biff bash up the middle. His vision and passing skills that put other players into space (eg Eastmond's try and from the base of the scrum for Fox's 2nd) are there whatever position he plays in as are his place and positional kicking and his high tackle count.

On Saturday the game plan was for Sinfield to be the organiser in chief no matter what his position and didn't he do well! In fact he was also the real captain on the field of play with constantly talking and encouraging the other players.

I am sure you will be please to learn that he has just been nominated as one of six shortlisted for the coveted Golden Boot award which is awarded annually to the world's greatest Rugby League player. So choke on that!

he must be a very intelligent poster to make an even bigger fool of himself because that takes some doing.

He didnt until desperation from TS breathed life into his International career, at half-time v Australia he was done.

He's now a "All Time Great" now though, FFS people are nuts round here!!

KS is clearly a Leeds great, without question.

But a great of the game? This Saturday is probably the first time he's been guaranteed a place in what has been a fairly awful GB/England team.

Having said that, I dearly hope he goes down as an all time great of the game, as it will mean he has helped us to win something

I believe Cunningham is a St Helens great but can never claim to be an all time great of the game as he didn't produce against the best of the best.

Sean Long has been as influential, if not more so, at Saints as Sinfield. He's won more trophies and more personal awards. He had a couple of good games for GB, including winning us a game against Australia in Sydney.

Do you think he is an all time great of the game? Or just a St Helens great?