Nah. He gave it for playing the ball after been tackled. Got it wrong like, should have been penalty to Leeds for tackling after the tackle completed, but that was his decision.

That's what I thought as well.

If it was for leading with the forearm, he sure waited a long time before giving the decision, it's not as though he'd play advantage in those circumstances.

Spot on. Im always a bit wary of Terry on the VR duties, but have been a staunch defender of him when he has the whistle, all you can say he was poor for both teams, very,very poor.

He "INDICATED" that senior had lead with the forearm and i agree we should of got the penalty because he'd called held and the giants tacklers were still trying to put him into touch.

He din't play the ball though did he, he threw it back. IMO Senior did the right thing, because if he did shout held then he couldn't play the ball because he was getting puched into touch. Poor decisioon IMO

I thought he had a good game and you should all stop moaning or ref yourself.

At the end of the day, without him, there was no game yesterday! get over yourselves and give the guy a break, he's doing a job that no one wants to do, but everyone likes to criticise.

The thing with Thierry is that he does not give clear signals, so the supporters get on his back. At the end of the day, so long as the players know what he's given a decision for, what does it matter?

Actually that's a very good observation. Some of his signals are unclear and you're left in the stand wondering what he's given and why. It also makes him look a bit like he's making it up as he goes along.

Seen him ref a few times this season and I don't think he's any worse than the others. I think yesterday was the poorest performance I've seen from him, but I doubt he favoured one side over the other. He did seem to struggle with the concept of a high tackle yesterday, nor did he seem fussed about two feet behind the line (but which ref does?).

For mine, he got 99% of the high tackle calls right, they weren't high tackles, they hit the shoulder first, if there was something he missed, it was the grabbing around the head and neck during the "wrestle" and on the floor!

like i said earlier, he has reffed us 3 times this season. twice he has been very good, yesterday he was awful.
like players he should has to take the rough with the smooth. like players he doesn't mean to have a bad game.
the fact is he was terrible yesterday,it happens

why do you think he was terrible? i wouldn't go along with that theory!

There were a few times he didn't seem to know what to do. Looking to the touch judge as if he didn't have a clue what was going on.

Just watching the match highlights on the Superleague site, how the obstruction on Lee Smith was missed when Rob made the break just before Kylie's try is puzzling.

I would agree that all ref's have good and bad games. Many of the high tackles perhaps came off a shoulder.
However, I cannot defend how many times he allowed Huddersfield to be offside. Where we sit (Paddock, at very far right end, row eight) you can clearly see who has two feet on the line and I would say 90% of the time they didn't. I'm aware it would be a very stop-start game if we stopped to check that all the time and that perhaps Thierry couldn't see, but isn't that what the touch judge is for?

i didn't have any real issues with the refere on Sunday. I barely noticed him which is always a good sign.