FORUMS > Leeds Rhinos > Wigan v Leeds | Sunday 26th May | Etihad Stadium | 7:30pm |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 32357 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
3076_1671446335.jpg SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS
For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.
For 27 - 0 you get a trophy
For 75 - 0 you get sod all.
Wigan had eight in a row
Saints have five in a row:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3076.jpg |
|
| Quote: tvoc "The NRL system could be worth a look at.
The on field officials confer as we do in SL, if they decide to go to the Video Referee they give their opinion on what they saw with a clear signal to show Try or No Try.
That's far from final but it shows what their on-field view is. If their live view is a Try then the video referee has to find a clear reason to overule.
Relating that to Sunday - assuming Silverwood was minded to award the try - as appeared the case with his clearly audible 'play-on' call then his initial Try decision may have been upheld by the VR.
Watched the St George V Penrith game at the weekend and despite having two video referees and an initial call of try from the onfield officials they still bizarrely (IMO) came up with an overule - so I guess as long as humans are involved it's probably impossible to eliminate all human error - whatever system you have.'"
Agree, it would have been interesting to see what Silverwoods call would have been. He obviously thought that there MAY have been a problem as asked the video ref to check possible obstruction.
I like the Aussie ruling as it does give a bit of direction to the video ref.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1906 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| I notice on the bbc super league show both tony smith and wilken thought the McGuire try should have been allowed.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 8147 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| I thought Smith contradicted himself on that one.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1755 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2023 | Jan 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
38511.jpg [b:3v5chy3z]Brian McDermott paraphrased Peter Fox.
"He'd say if we had 13 Bernard Dwyers we wouldn't lose many RL games. It's the same for us with JJB"[/b:3v5chy3z]:38511.jpg |
|
| wigan got all the 50/50 calls yet again from bentham just like at wembley in 2011
regarding the no-try,would this have been picked up had the game not been on tv?
i agree that players now know how to impede dummy runners and how to best reap the rewards but surely common sense must prevail and that the impeded player would have to have been capable of stopping the try,i don't believe that sundays incident was preventable by the impeded player alone,add to the fact how far out the incident occurred too as most obstructions happen much closer to the tryline
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5526 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2019 | Mar 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: SmokeyTA "I think the bigger problem from my point of view was he had already called play-on, Silverwood saw the incident and made a decision on it. It wasn’t a case of him allowing the play to see where it finished (at the time of the offence it wasn’t a clear opportunity) more him seeing an incident, making a decision on it, then because it eventually resulted in a try getting a 2nd opinion on it. The issue is the discrepancy between Mcguire getting tackled a yard out, and Leeds scoring the next play-the-ball and the referees decision stands, and Mcguire scoring with a good bit of play and the referee giving up on his decision. I think there need to be a process whereby either we stick with the referee’s decision that he made when he called play-on originally, or that possible obstruction is checked by the VR even if he doesn’t score.'"
I agree.
The pertinent point for me is that if McGuire hadn't had the skill to dummy Tomkins and Tomkins had been a better FB (a la Hardaker ) by making the tackle; then any legitamate score off the next play would have been allowed and the 'obstruction' forgotten.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5813 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2022 | Mar 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
icons3ae4_files/4541-162reymo-msnicons.jpg If your not cheating, your not trying. Barrie Mcdermott:icons3ae4_files/4541-162reymo-msnicons.jpg |
|
| Quote: nantwichexile "I agree.
The pertinent point for me is that if McGuire hadn't had the skill to dummy Tomkins and Tomkins had been a better FB (a la Hardaker
Personally while watching the game I was shouting at the TV for Mags to take the tackle as when I saw it at the time I thought obstruction.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1661 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: ROCHDALERHINO "Without the cameras there yesterday the Maguire try stands and we win the game '"
By that logic Powell's try just after half time would have been allowed and at 26-12 the game would probably have been over.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 22289 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
4615.jpg :4615.jpg |
|
| Quote: gary numan "I know well about the velocity in relation to the ground etc.. but it is quite clear that the ball leaves tomkins hand in a forward motion not just because the player is moving in a forward direction.'"
The only thing that is quite clear is that you and I have a different opinion on the direction it left Tomkins hands. More camera angles are needed and even then only if positioned precisely in line and people will still no doubt see things differently. Camera angles from behind the play (majority of TV shots as cameras tend to be positioned high above the centre line) tend to make passes look more forward than they are while cameras from behind the dead-ball line have the opposite effect.
Flat and backward passes are legal. Tomkins would have found it difficult to propel the ball forward while moving at speed and had he managed to do so Richards would have needed to be stood in front of the passer or sprouted wings in order to collect it, IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 906 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2012 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2020 | Mar 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
67994_1345549562.jpg [img:2xirtsxp]http://i.imgur.com/McLig5F.jpg[/img:2xirtsxp]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_67994.jpg |
|
| Quote: Finfin "By that logic Powell's try just after half time would have been allowed and at 26-12 the game would probably have been over.'"
I think he was short anyway
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 7631 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Jul 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
6016_1402401129.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_6016.jpg |
|
| Quote: Finfin "By that logic Powell's try just after half time would have been allowed and at 26-12 the game would probably have been over.'"
I would imagine Watkins try may not have been given without the replays also
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 5587 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2024 | Sep 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
9540_1301256496.jpg [size=167:3ujhocvk][b:3ujhocvk]The best way to predict the future is to create it...[/size:3ujhocvk][/b:3ujhocvk]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_9540.jpg |
|
| Quote: tvoc "The only thing that is quite clear is that you and I have a different opinion on the direction it left Tomkins hands. More camera angles are needed and even then only if positioned precisely in line and people will still no doubt see things differently. Camera angles from behind the play (majority of TV shots as cameras tend to be positioned high above the centre line) tend to make passes look more forward than they are while cameras from behind the dead-ball line have the opposite effect.
Flat and backward passes are legal. Tomkins would have found it difficult to propel the ball forward while moving at speed and had he managed to do so Richards would have needed to be stood in front of the passer or sprouted wings in order to collect it, IMO.'"
Strange how all the other passes shown from the same camera angle in that attacking set look backwards, it's only the Tomkins to Richards that is an optical illusion.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 32357 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
3076_1671446335.jpg SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS
For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.
For 27 - 0 you get a trophy
For 75 - 0 you get sod all.
Wigan had eight in a row
Saints have five in a row:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3076.jpg |
|
| Quote: Jonesy's a Legend "wigan got all the 50/50 calls yet again from bentham just like at wembley in 2011
regarding the no-try,would this have been picked up had the game not been on tv?
i agree that players now know how to impede dummy runners and how to best reap the rewards but surely common sense must prevail and that the impeded player would have to have been capable of stopping the try,i don't believe that sundays incident was preventable by the impeded player alone,add to the fact how far out the incident occurred too as most obstructions happen much closer to the tryline'"
What's Bentham got to do with it?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 8147 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| The score was 20-16, a four point difference.
Pick where that four points came from,
a) Bailey's push on Logan Tomkins, result a pen and two points.
b) JJ Buchanan's lifting Lauaki's leg and pushing him over, pen and 2 points.
c) Sinfield's poor kick from which Charnley scored a try, four points.
Eight points to Wigan there and all through Leeds' mistakes.
As far as the Mcguire touch down, McDermott agreed that it was the right decision under the rules. He just didn't like the way the rules were applied to his team, that's all.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1155 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
60930_1348487834.jpg [b:hckzm0kh]Never Underestimate A Rhino[/b:hckzm0kh]
Challenge Cup Winners 1909–10, 1922–23, 1931–32, 1935–36, 1940–41, 1941–42, 1956–57, 1967–68, 1976–77, 1977–78, 1999, 2014, 2015, 2020
Superleague Champions 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2015, 2017
Championship Winners 1960–61, 1968–69, 1971–72
World Club Champions 2005, 2008, 2012
Premiership Winners 1974–75, 1978–79
SL League Leaders 2004, 2009, 2015:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_60930.jpg |
|
| Quote: SmokeyTA "I think the bigger problem from my point of view was he had already called play-on, Silverwood saw the incident and made a decision on it. It wasn’t a case of him allowing the play to see where it finished (at the time of the offence it wasn’t a clear opportunity) more him seeing an incident, making a decision on it, then because it eventually resulted in a try getting a 2nd opinion on it. The issue is the discrepancy between Mcguire getting tackled a yard out, and Leeds scoring the next play-the-ball and the referees decision stands, and Mcguire scoring with a good bit of play and the referee giving up on his decision. I think there need to be a process whereby either we stick with the referee’s decision that he made when he called play-on originally, or that possible obstruction is checked by the VR even if he doesn’t score.'"
I agree with this to some respect. Watching 'The Superleague Show' Tony Smith made a good point re Hullgate. He said he would expect the on pitch officials to pick up the offside without the need for the VR
Remember there are 5 games a week without the "so-called" advantage of the VR, and in this case the advantage has clearly failed. Would Thaler have given the try in a non-televised match?
During the Leeds replay I quite clearly heard Silverwood say "play on" as McGuire went behind his player. At the moment it seems the referees are using the video referee way too much for things that in the past would've been expected to be picked up by themselves. As far as Im concerned, the ref made his decision, play on, Leeds scored. There shouldn't have been any possible reason for him to go to the VR. The video ref should be used for try's like Dixons and Watkins superb corner efforts, not for something that happens 10min before on the halfway line which should've been picked up by a touch judge or referee anyway!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 4239 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2013 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
实事求是!: |
|
| Quote: Rhinoshaund III "I agree with this to some respect. Watching 'The Superleague Show' Tony Smith made a good point re Hullgate. He said he would expect the on pitch officials to pick up the offside without the need for the VR
Remember there are 5 games a week without the "so-called" advantage of the VR, and in this case the advantage has clearly failed. Would Thaler have given the try in a non-televised match?
During the Leeds replay I quite clearly heard Silverwood say "play on" as McGuire went behind his player. At the moment it seems the referees are using the video referee way too much for things that in the past would've been expected to be picked up by themselves. As far as Im concerned, the ref made his decision, play on, Leeds scored. There shouldn't have been any possible reason for him to go to the VR. The video ref should be used for try's like Dixons and Watkins superb corner efforts, not for something that happens 10min before on the halfway line which should've been picked up by a touch judge or referee anyway!'"
It's done, move on. By the letter of the law mcguire infringed, the ref, after hullgate, wanted to make absolutly sure so referred it and the video ref made the right (albeit annoying) call. Had it not been for the stupidity of some of our own players we'd have probably won regardless.
We need to focus on getting back to winning ways now as we are still well in contention for for 2nd place.
|
|
|
|
|
|