FORUMS > Leeds Rhinos > Carl Ablett |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 11658 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2018 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
35138.jpg Fat people are harder to kidnap.:35138.jpg |
|
| Quote: Fishsta "NO IT ISN'T. And that's where the issue is. You're suggesting that this is part of the game, when the reality is there is no place for it.'"
I really doesn't matter what is right or wrong, nor does it matter if it is illegal or not - incidents like this occur all the time so, like it or not, they are therefore part of the game - what is so hard to understand about this. You bleating on about it isn't going to stop dangerous tackles. I think you should continue this conversation with King Canute, he had the same outlook as you but on tidal wash!
Quote: Fishsta "If you want hypocrisy, how about LS16_Rhino for not saying at the time of, just picking a wild example at random, O'Loughlin's hit on Robinson, "It's part of the game... Live with it!"'"
This is really the 'dimmest' thing you have posted so far (and there has been plenty of contenders) - you are branding me a hypocrite for NOT posting an opinion - really!!!, so you are expecting me to post my opinion on every incident that occurs in every Rugby game ever?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2110 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2020 | Mar 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| imo its the one of the worst things that can happen to a player when they are hit when they cannot defend themselves and cover up,has an ex player myself i thought ablett was reckless and although not intentional it was more good luck that tompkins hasnt broken his jaw.
i listened to the re-run on radio leeds with jason demitriou and to say he was disgusted by the challenge was an understatement,has a current player he understands what its like to be out their and to see an attack to another proffesionals head like that is the worst possible challenge and it should be punished.
i can see the rfl giving ablett at least 2 games with it been reduced to 1 on appeal but imo its nothing close to enough.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 32302 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2018 | Oct 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
982.jpg [quote:1pqtnbtj]Every player in our squad could probably earn more money with another club. But they prefer to sacrifice a few extra quid in their back pocket to share special memories. And playing at a place like Old Trafford on a night like this makes it all worthwhile.[/quote:1pqtnbtj]
Kevin Sinfield:982.jpg |
|
| Quote: Fishsta "
Post of years? What's that?
Seeing as no-one else is talking about the "assault" you mention, maybe it isn't worthy of mention? There were certainly no other incidents in the same league as Ablett's.
However, if what you say is true, I wouldn't condone it, and I wouldn't deny your right to post your opinion on it, pushing for whatever ban you think it deserves.
'" Sorry, it mean to say post of "yours". Actually, you mean nobody from Wigan is talking about it because they're self righteous hypocrites. Both TVOC and i have mentioned it a few times.
It's just that Ridell was penalised for an attack to Burrow's head (unlike Ablett how has not yet been found guilty of such an offence). If you're really not a biased supporter spouting bile about one specific incident I'd have expected your righteous crusade to have included Ridell's penalised actions. But it hasn't done. That's why I don't take you seriously.
And I won't be calling for a Ridell banning because, unlike you, I take a bit more of a balanced view of the game and understand that players, playing at such high intensity often make errors of Judgment or slips in technique. These things happen. My cajones are a little bit too big to start squealing about life time bans etc.
HTH
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
33791.jpg [b:1swa1vwo]Change is inevitable
...except from a vending machine![/b:1swa1vwo]
[quote="BillyRhino":1swa1vwo]So in best IA mode ..<.Possibley World Class, could be the greatest thing since sliced bread....am personally very excited, and confidently expect him to prove my predictions are bang on target.... Alternatively he could be rubbish>
IA mode off. [/quote:1swa1vwo]:33791.jpg |
|
| G1 - What is also interesting is all the keyboard warriors who think they know the laws and the various guidelines but have never taken the time to read them and just assume that they know them, or there opinion should be the law and can't understand why it isn't!
The review panel will currently be sitting looking at the videos from the weekend. The first thing is that they will watch the Ablett incident at full speed from as many angles as available, over and over again if required, and rarely look at contact with the head cases in slow-mo unless they think there is good reason to. Why? Because slow-mo distorts the viewers perception of time, as we live our life in real time and not slow-mo, they need to consider split second actions of players and what impact that had on the intent and outcome.
They have to decide if the tackle or intended tackle was either Careless, Reckless or Intentional or none of them. If they decide it was not any, they can still issue warning and letters which will be placed on a players record.
So, was Ablett Careless, Reckless or Intentional in his tackle on Tomkins? I think he was possibly Careless and maybe at a push Reckless but I do not think it was Intentional AND you have to look at the specific definitions of these terms in the guidelines. This means the 'guide' on suspension is 0 to 3 games!
Now, lets look at aggravating factors
Previous Record
Violence
Retaliation
Injury caused
Incident not part of play
Other aggravating factors
and mitigating factors
Previous Good Record
Provocation
Technique or Fitness in some cases
Genuine Remorse
Other Mitigating Factors
So, when you look at the aggravating factors for Ablett there isn't any, he does not have a previous record to speak of and did not cause injury (luckily).
When you look at mitigating factors he has a previous good (well excellent) record and suspect that he did apologise to Tomkins after the game and will tell the disciplinary panel (if he gets there) that he was remorseful. Not injuring a player is not a mitigating factor BTW, for obvious reasons.
So, is Ablett going get to get a ban? Well if he does 1 and possibly 2 matches would seem to me to be the maximum, IMO, he is looking at. I also think that, given his excellent record, that not getting one at all but being fined £300 quid along with a warning is a likely outcome.
Predictions - Ok, when the review panel publish their findings this afternoon if Ablett is charged with being Careless I think it will be a fine and warning, if he gets charged with being Reckless he will get a one match ban. If he gets charged with being intentional, well I will be very surprised!
So, if my predictions come true, before the keyboard warriors start spouting the usual rubbish, read the guidelines and the reports and then tell us why they were wrong... bet you they don't though!
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 17230 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Nov 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
3043_1291817917.jpg #frostiesbitches We know who you are.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3043.jpg |
|
| Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "G1 - What is also interesting is all the keyboard warriors who think they know the laws and the various guidelines but have never taken the time to read them and just assume that they know them, or there opinion should be the law and can't understand why it isn't!
The review panel will currently be sitting looking at the videos from the weekend. The first thing is that they will watch the Ablett incident at full speed from as many angles as available, over and over again if required, and rarely look at contact with the head cases in slow-mo unless they think there is good reason to. Why? Because slow-mo distorts the viewers perception of time, as we live our life in real time and not slow-mo, they need to consider split second actions of players and what impact that had on the intent and outcome.
They have to decide if the tackle or intended tackle was either Careless, Reckless or Intentional or none of them. If they decide it was not any, they can still issue warning and letters which will be placed on a players record.
So, was Ablett Careless, Reckless or Intentional in his tackle on Tomkins? I think he was possibly Careless and maybe at a push Reckless but I do not think it was Intentional AND you have to look at the specific definitions of these terms in the guidelines. This means the 'guide' on suspension is 0 to 3 games!
Now, lets look at aggravating factors
Previous Record
Violence
Retaliation
Injury caused
Incident not part of play
Other aggravating factors
and mitigating factors
Previous Good Record
Provocation
Technique or Fitness in some cases
Genuine Remorse
Other Mitigating Factors
So, when you look at the aggravating factors for Ablett there isn't any, he does not have a previous record to speak of and did not cause injury (luckily).
When you look at mitigating factors he has a previous good (well excellent) record and suspect that he did apologise to Tomkins after the game and will tell the disciplinary panel (if he gets there) that he was remorseful. Not injuring a player is not a mitigating factor BTW, for obvious reasons.
So, is Ablett going get to get a ban? Well if he does 1 and possibly 2 matches would seem to me to be the maximum, IMO, he is looking at. I also think that, given his excellent record, that not getting one at all but being fined £300 quid along with a warning is a likely outcome.
Predictions - Ok, when the review panel publish their findings this afternoon if Ablett is charged with being Careless I think it will be a fine and warning, if he gets charged with being Reckless he will get a one match ban. If he gets charged with being intentional, well I will be very surprised!
So, if my predictions come true, before the keyboard warriors start spouting the usual rubbish, read the guidelines and the reports and then tell us why they were wrong... bet you they don't though!'"
Excellent post, and about all it needed on this thread. Why didn't you post on page 2? could have saved another 12 pages of nauseating bile.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 833 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2013 | Jul 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: G1 "Sorry, it mean to say post of "yours". Actually, you mean nobody from Wigan is talking about it because they're self righteous hypocrites. Both TVOC and i have mentioned it a few times.
It's just that Ridell was penalised for an attack to Burrow's head (unlike Ablett how has not yet been found guilty of such an offence). If you're really not a biased supporter spouting bile about one specific incident I'd have expected your righteous crusade to have included Ridell's penalised actions. But it hasn't done. That's why I don't take you seriously.
And I won't be calling for a Ridell banning because, unlike you, I take a bit more of a balanced view of the game and understand that players, playing at such high intensity often make errors of Judgment or slips in technique. These things happen. My cajones are a little bit too big to start squealing about life time bans etc.
HTH'"
After Farrells sin binning in the cup game when most Leeds fans wanted a red surely you can see why Wigan fans are very confused why Ablett is on report considering the video ref tells the referee that there is contact with the arm to the head!! Then Coley goes for a tackle that was a pen at worse. For our 1st try Hall hits Gleeson as late!
If Ablett doesnt get a game ban then I would be very suprised!
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 17230 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Nov 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
3043_1291817917.jpg #frostiesbitches We know who you are.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3043.jpg |
|
| Quote: Ian Roberts Closet "After Farrells sin binning in the cup game when most Leeds fans wanted a red surely you can see why Wigan fans are very confused why Ablett is on report considering the video ref tells the referee that there is contact with the arm to the head!! Then Coley goes for a tackle that was a pen at worse. For our 1st try Hall hits Gleeson as late!
If Ablett doesnt get a game ban then I would be very suprised!'"
Who called for Farrell to have a red? surely that is made up.
What actually happend is that Leeds defended the fact that Farrell was sinbinned, when Wigan fans were frothing at the mouth, that despite a late shot on a defenceless player, you all thought he was harshly treated.
This despite the fact that it is clear in the rules that a late challenge is a sinbin.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 10399 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2016 | Jul 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
16208_1345534518.jpg [url=www.cater-bake.co.uk]Cater-Bake UK - Pizza and Bakery Equipment Specialists[/url]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_16208.jpg |
|
| Right, I haven't seen the incident, and don't know exactly what happened - only that its upset a few people.
So I can have a look before a read too many opinions, can you tell me what time in the game it happened, as it'll be a while before I'll have time to watch the whole game through.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5526 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2018 | Jan 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
1 Warrington 2 Hull 3 Wigan 4 Castleford 4 Castleford 5 St Helens 6 Leeds 7 Catalans 8 Hudedersfield 9 Widnes 10 Wakefield
11 Salford 12 Leigh
Playoffs:Warrington Hull Wigan Castleford
Four sides rejoining: Widnes Wakefield Salford Leigh
GF Winners Warrington CC Winners Wigan: |
|
| Quote: p1e e8ter "Have you seen the size of Ablett (who was moving, Tomkins was stood still) compared to S Tomkins? If you need to "protect" yourself like that, then he shouldn't be playing rugby league.'"
Have you seen the size of Ritchie Myler who was prone on the ground having score a try when he was whacked from behind by Joel Tomkins? IIR all he recieved was a slap on the wrist & a £300 fine.
Have yo seen the size of Burrow who was clattered round the neck by Riddell?
Ablett's challenge was bad & will be dealt with but you need to look at your own team as well before castigating others.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 16166 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2018 | Dec 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
44464_1476556895.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_44464.jpg |
|
| Quote: Offside Monkey "Right, I haven't seen the incident, and don't know exactly what happened - only that its upset a few people.
So I can have a look before a read too many opinions, can you tell me what time in the game it happened, as it'll be a while before I'll have time to watch the whole game through.'"
rlAround 17.20 into thisrl
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 22289 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
4615.jpg :4615.jpg |
|
| Quote: Old Feller "Have you seen the size of Ritchie Myler who was prone on the ground having score a try when he was whacked from behind by Joel Tomkins? IIR all he recieved was a slap on the wrist & a £300 fine.
'"
What would you have a Leeds player do in that situation with an opponent over the line and it not been clear whether the ball was grounded or not?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5526 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2018 | Jan 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
1 Warrington 2 Hull 3 Wigan 4 Castleford 4 Castleford 5 St Helens 6 Leeds 7 Catalans 8 Hudedersfield 9 Widnes 10 Wakefield
11 Salford 12 Leigh
Playoffs:Warrington Hull Wigan Castleford
Four sides rejoining: Widnes Wakefield Salford Leigh
GF Winners Warrington CC Winners Wigan: |
|
| Quote: tvoc "What would you have a Leeds player do in that situation with an opponent over the line and it not been clear whether the ball was grounded or not?'"
So you condone Tomkin's actions?
I would not want a Leeds player to emulate Tomkins' actions.
The RFL disciplinary committee obviously agree with me otherwise Tomkins would not have been charged or fined.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 22289 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
4615.jpg :4615.jpg |
|
| Quote: Offside Monkey "So I can have a look before a read too many opinions, can you tell me what time in the game it happened, as it'll be a while before I'll have time to watch the whole game through.'"
The play the ball by Peacock that Sinfield hoisted the up and under from was at 15 minutes 00 seconds into the game.
Quote: Offside Monkey "So you condone Tomkin's actions?
I would not want a Leeds player to emulate Tomkins' actions.
The RFL disciplinary committee obviously agree with me otherwise Tomkins would not have been charged or fined.'"
In that situation absolutely yes as I said at the time.
To me it was unclear as to whether or not Myler had grounded the ball and I would have been disgusted had a Leeds player in that situation not gone in to try and prevent the try from being scored.
As for the RFL how difficult would it be for you to find a decision you didn't agree with?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 833 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2013 | Jul 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Gotcha "Who called for Farrell to have a red? surely that is made up.
What actually happend is that Leeds defended the fact that Farrell was sinbinned, when Wigan fans were frothing at the mouth, that despite a late shot on a defenceless player, you all thought he was harshly treated.
This despite the fact that it is clear in the rules that a late challenge is a sinbin.'"
On the day there were shouts of off and Leeds fans I spoke to said it was a red as it was a bad challenge!!
He caught him hip to hip and was already in the air before he kicked!! But yet the "defenceless player" rolled round as though he had been smashed in the head!
And if a late challenge on the kicker is a sin binning it isnt always given! Deacon got hit late in France and yesterday I saw Lunt hit Ben Jeffires late and nothing given!! So it would seem its when it suits! Also why did Hall not recieve a yellow for hitting Gleeson late for our 1st try??
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 19234 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2016 | Feb 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
35376_1277564281.gif [img:35s0tdes]http://i84.servimg.com/u/f84/12/34/74/45/lr200913.gif[/img:35s0tdes]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_35376.gif |
|
| Quote: Ian Roberts Closet "On the day there were shouts of off and Leeds fans I spoke to said it was a red as it was a bad challenge!!
He caught him hip to hip and was already in the air before he kicked!! But yet the "defenceless player" rolled round as though he had been smashed in the head!
And if a late challenge on the kicker is a sin binning it isnt always given! Deacon got hit late in France and yesterday I saw Lunt hit Ben Jeffires late and nothing given!! So it would seem its when it suits! Also why did Hall not recieve a yellow for hitting Gleeson late for our 1st try??'"
More ill informed bollox Mcguire was in mid air and got taken out by a player charging towards him he fell back and hit the deck and naturally rolled over you plank not a Ronaldo act and then got up.
|
|
|
|
|
|