IMO the RL have gone a long way to diminish finishing top of the league by introducing such a poxy trophy as the hubcap.
I mean,it's horrible.Nearly on a par with the Co-op trophy.
We had a fantastic trophy in the old championship one.
It always grates me why that couldn't have been used.

How can it be meaningless ? 27 rounds in the regular season must surely count for something . Try telling the players that their efforts over the season , the injuries , the tears , the elation , the exhaustion , the triumphs , and the defeats , have meant nothing . Tell them that was just the warm-up games for the real thing , and that you just want to see them win the last match in what is a bonus competition .

Methinks whichever player you say such a thing to rightly deserves to give you a proper good smack in the teeth .

27 rounds for the hubcap against 3 or 4 for the GF..which could possibly be won by a team that has won only half of the regular rounds .
Surely the hubcap deserves to be recognised as THE trophy of the season .

Maybe next season we should just aim at finishing in the top 8 . That means less effort for the players . We could rest our top players when we have got enough points to finish 8th or higher, and give the juniors a run out for the rest of the season . Would you be happy watching them getting turned over every week while our better players get themselves rested and fit for the play-offs ? I wouldn't .
I will be attending the GF again this year . It would be good to win it again , but it ain't the end of the world if we don't .

Friday - Champs by 18.

Would you rather win the Hub-Cap or the GF??????
The RFL have brought the Hub-Cap in as an after-thought and imo the prestige of winning it is way behind the GF.

Hubcap by plenty . Simply because it rewards the efforts of the team over the whole season .
The GF is just the icing on the cake (could put the cake on the hubcap . It looks more like a cake tray than a hubcap anyway )

Is the 5% allocation for Saints fans???

I dont see why we cant just have both

Surely the true champions are the team that finishes top of the league when the regular season ends . League champions .
GF winners are merely the winners of a post-season tournament .
As for the WCC . Similar to the yank 'World Series' imho . Surely you need to have a few more countries contesting it bofore to can put 'WORLD' in the title of a competition .

nope, your wrong. the champions are the grand final winners

They are 'named as champions' . So the rounds prior to the play-offs are actually only qualifying games then , and as such are really meaningless . A team that wins 17 games can be named champions over a team that has won possibly 30 games but loses at the GF. I know which team I would consider to be the champions .

I don't care much for the GF . I will attend because it is a good day out . I hope we can get there and win it again so we can sing 'that's why we're champions' again next season .
I actually started singing it at Hunslet when we were losing

Here we have the common misunderstanding of the "insular" attitude of the yanks in having a "world series".
It is usual to put the sponsors' name in front of the title of the competition. The series of games was sponsored by "World" and therefore became known as the "World Series".

Thanks for that . You learn something new every day .
So do 'World' sponsor the WCC as well ?

Nope, because its "Carnegie World Club Challenge".

That answer that for you?

I know that . So when are the rest of the world going to be invited to contest it and make it a proper 'WORLD' Club Challenge ?