My point was, if you look at things from just one angle (i.e. who we signed in those years) you're only going to ariive at one conclusion.

If you take into account who we let go at the same time then this would provide a more balanced conclusion.

3 is greater than 1.

Comprende?

Why?

The pertinent point i am making is that last year two young lads emerged as regular props as part of this alleged 5 man rotation, Burgess and Scruton.

BOTH came from within the club.

So, if a 5th prop is needed why the clamour to sign one from without? Who is to say we don't already have one ready to do a "Burgess"?

When we signed Burgess has naff all to do with that point.

So, do you have any answers?

And?

Can you name a prop from within who has the ability to do a "Burgess" this year? And don't even try and mention Ambler; he's way off at present.

Anyway, this trivial point you raise is deviating away from the whole point of the thread - we're short on forwards. We've lost Scruton and Ellis and we've not replaced them yet.

Can you name replacements for these two?

As mentioned several times Ablett and Buderus.
Ablett no longer needs to cover centre so he can now play in his natural position.
I'm sure Eastwood would have been included as well but [i"due to unforeseen circumstances"[/i he won't be joining until 2010

..and therefore it is simple maths.

Are you ok today?

But he hasn't come has he.

If we'd signed Fuifui Moi Moi he'd be included. but we haven't have we.

So it would seem the obvious solution is to take a decent player in the Eastwood mould from Australia who may struggle for some reason to get a first team spot in Oz on loan for this season .
This may not happen for a few months until the teams in Oz bed down and sort themselves out.
Simple and everyone is happy.... I think.

Fine thanks. Just apeing your condescending, brief and pointless method of debate.

Stick to simple maths. Let those that aren't simple stick to assembling a Championship squad of Rugby players, like they have been doing.

I've no idea. I don't watch the Academy that closely. Then again, I couldn't have given you a more meaningful opinion on Burgess at the stage last year.

What was your opinion Burgess' abilities at the start of 2008? Did you post them anywhere?

How much of Ambler have you seen? What about our other Academy props? Are you saying none of them are up to any game time?

If I'm not wrong at this time last year hadn't Burgess yet to make his debut? This means we were essentially going into the season with 4 props and relying on a youngster if needed.

Everything apart from his Visa was in place for him to come. It was only a couple of weeks ago that the saga came to an end. Up until that point he was still a replacement forward.

Manipulating my quote by cutting the part that suits you does you no service at all and suggests that it is not worth debating with you in the first place. I will consider that as an error of judgement on your part on this occasion.

andy lynch is OOC at the seasons end. a little cheeky bid might be fruitful methinks. a little cash for the bulls for a player who will leave for free at the end of the season and a good signing for leeds.