Care to enlighten us how you actually know this then Gotcha?

If it's on the 18th Man, I wouldn't pay much attention.

What are you on about troll ??. Who do you think you are. You spout useless and unfounded rubbish constantly on here to gain attention. You dont like it when someone challenges you to prove it, like several people do.

Seriously shut up you silly tart. I responded to a post about a journalist piece, confirming it incorrect. Just admit it, you jumped in without reading, and acted the jumped up little tart you are trying to be the big I am. Only you looking for attention here.

What exactly do I need to prove? That he is not jumping ship like I said, and seems the majority have also said on here? Grow up.

Your very 1st post on this thread was very cleverly worded Gotcha as a lot of your posts seem to be i have to say, whether intentional or not, it read that Moon wanted a new deal and club wanted him out to free up cap space which simply isnt true. Your posts after suggest its not true and hes staying.

Moon is contracted to 2018 and thats the only story here in my opinion.

Thank you very much Marty. Exactly what i meant Gotcha.

I have it on relatively good authority that this is BS. He has 3 kids, 2 of which are in the Leeds school system and a new baby. I suggest it would be unlikely that this would happen and is perhaps more 'soccer' style angling for a new contract/payrise tactics. As for home sickness, hes been in the UK for over 5 years and has a contract until 2018 www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/rugbyl ... hinos.html

I have it on relatively good authority that this is BS. He has 3 kids, 2 of which are in the Leeds school system and a new baby. I suggest it would be unlikely that this would happen and is perhaps more 'soccer' style angling for a new contract/payrise tactics. As for home sickness, hes been in the UK for over 5 years and has a contract until 2018 www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/rugbyl ... hinos.html

Excuse me, but I think that is just an excuse for been found out. Please, and I don't mind you doing it, point out which bit of that post said the club wanted him out? I am not saying I don't sometimes word it wrong, but certainly not there.

I was very clear, that the club have to make a lot of changes over the next 18 months, which inclused overseas positions. I was very clear that Moon is only looking for a new deal, as his existing one runs out when he is 30. And I was very clear that he is definitely not jumping ship. Those things were all said in the first post. Nothing clever about it at all, I was dissagreeing with the journalist, and which it seems many other posts since have, but for some idiot jumping on a bandwagon.

If you want my honest opinion, if Moon is pushing for an early decision on a new contract, and bearing in mind he is an overseas spot, I reckon the club will replace and allow him to leave. But at this time I don't think the club or player have that in mind. But if you think of another scenario, Reed is avilable, is british, and will be on similar money to Moon. If the club is looking for changes would that move effect us?

any need for such abuse? you don't agree with gotcha then fine. at least discuss it properly. no wonder this forum is a pale shadow of what it used to be

You said the club want to move in totally different direction to Moon and want to free up cap space and quota spots. That was what i was referring to but as i said in posts after you say the opposite.

Not sure what you are referring to by "being found out" but not here to score points. I was just pointing out why other posters were being abusive.

I said, and was clear, that the club were not considering offering him a new deal, which he wanted, and were looking in a different direction. That is different to saying he is going and we are looking to get rid, and it was in response to a post that he was jumping ship. His contract does not expire for another two years. I even clearly said, a lot of changes will be made over the next 18 months, how does that relate to now?




That comment wasn't referring to you. Just to the other who seems to spout bile all the time without reading properly.

I read it like Marty, it could be interpreted in a couple of ways. Agree with tad, no need to give you crap, can't see what you did to deserve that. it's just semantics and nobody should support anti semanticsism.

Hey up, Jack Reed's coming now! Is that before or after Westerman, Clark and Burgess? Gotcha is back to his attention seeking best

where did he say reed was coming? he said reed, having a British passport, could be a better option than moon, freeing up an overseas spot. if you're going to hand out abuse at least read his post properly because if not only one person looks silly