I am awaiting Phil Clarke's view on this incident before my mind is made up regarding the incident as i believe that he will deem that such a serious and intentional incident will certainly awaken the Rugby Gods and that they will ultimately have the final say on this matter regarding the true severity of sneyd's actions,even if the RL Disciplinary committee deemed this incident as being not too serious

Maybe Hull should sign a half back for 2016

Open question:

Do people think sneyds offence was worse than what flower did to hohiah in the gf?

Personally I would say punching a defenceless opponent and twisting the limb of a defenceless opponent are very similar. Only difference is one was a showpiece on tv and one wasn't.

Just an observation...

The charge was downgraded from grade D to grade C , would be interested to know why ? Very odd .

Because they made the charge fit the penalty they had decided to award. Simples

2 matches for that "tackle " is a disgrace. I don't for one minute believe Sneyd planned what he did, but the fact is that while he was hold of Danny's ankle he decided to twist and wrench it - and that wasn't an accident. Rush of blood to the head or not it's got to be dealt with decisively or every $h1thouse in the league will be able to reference this feeble ban when required.

You have a point, while neither have any place in rugby, or in life, you don't threaten a guy's livelihood by gobbing on him.

its going to take litigation to bring the RFLs disciplinary process into the 21st century. The officials are not properly protecting players and the disciplinary process is condoning it. 2games for a teckle that was intended nly to injure an opponent is a joke. A serious career ending injury will result in the RFL and a member club being sued.

Don't waste your time replying, Printer. If he doesn't understand it the first time he won't even after its explained to him.

It's easy to see why the refs are so poor and inconsistent, when the people above them a leading with such examples.

I don't for one minute thinks Sneyd has done it with intention to injure, however, he's charged with grade D, it gets dropped to a C which is 'dangerous contact' the world can see it's the grade D description of applying pressure to a joint, so it's either guilty or not..... Bottled it!

I suppose you wont have a livelihood if you die from a disease spread by spitting

No he didn't. Stop making rubbish up idiot as normal. He clenched his fist and was going to hit him, but did not.

Ah, intent.

Thats still a ban then

There are no diseases spread hy spitting. It's not jurassic park mate.