4 points would put us at least 8 points for 5th with 10 to play for.

For us to not qualify for the 4 if we win two, Sts would need to win 5 of the last 6 AND Wakefield would need to win 4 of 5 and hope to have a better points difference.

You are the only person who didn't see it then - hardly surprising

The copy of the payment was posted on thread where you raised the notion I would have to pay up - suggest you re-visit the thread or ask one of the moderators who locked it after sight of the payment was posted.

i saw it tbf

Thought Leeds looked disinterested whilst Wakefield after getting their backsides kicked by their coach out enthused us outplayed and out muscled us.
We got what we deserved.
For me Keinhorst for Ablett, Garbutt for JJB and Baldwinson on the bench.
McGuire had a bad day and stopped trying instead of putting in the extra effort as captain.
What was the idea subbing Golding btw
Well played Wakey.

Apart from the fact he was awful on the night, I think he picked up a hamstring injury again.

Thought we were excellent and full value for our win...if we repeat that kind of performance in every game left we're sure to win another few....the telling stat for me was the error count...21 for Leeds and 12 for us...if you dig further into that, 10 of our 12 errors happened inside the Leeds 20...8 of them inside the 10 and most on the last tackle.......any team who makes only two handling errors from between their own line and the opposition 20 in 80 minutes has had a pretty good day at the office in my eyes....because of that we continually asked Leeds to go 90 metres and our defense coped pretty comfortably....

With Miller now back (who we've badly missed) and Tyler Randell expected to arrive this week it's a real timely boost to take forward off the back of such a convincing win...we could just fall short up front if we pick up another knock or two and that could really hurt us.....great to see four Yorkshire teams in the top four at present though, long may it continue!

Now we've decided that Watkins is our main kicker ??? that takes away the reason for having Sutcliffe on the field. We've tried him at stand off,full back and now centre and he's not managed to hold down a place. Keinhorst if far more reliable in defence too but really our main problem is our left centre is playing out of position. WE need a running half back. Just look at the problems Jacob Miller gave us this week, he'd be an absolute star in the Leeds team. Plus we need some size and aggression in the pack

McGuire is a running half back.
it was.

we need a controlling half back who can dictate play, when to slow down and when to speed up.
get moon back to centre. I really don't rate him at 6.

Moon is not a 6 and never will be he lacks the basic skill set to be an effective half back

no passing game, limited kicking game. what he does is get his hands on the ball more.

so why don't we get early, quality ball to moon and Watkins and let them exploit space and get them one on one? hardly rocket science.

Exactly. This has been my beef all along about BMDs coaching.

I have NO problem with BMDs standard of defensive coaching.

I have little problem with BMDs man-management on the whole.

I have huge problems with BMDs standard of attack coaching - in fact I see very little evidence of ANY attack coaching (other than 5 drives close to the ruck & a kick; or if near the opposition line, give it to McGuire/Moon & see if they can use their magic feet to open up a try)

I have huge problems with BMDs use of his players/subs.

Leeds's four most recent defensive efforts have conceded 34, 43, 16 and now 38.

The only acceptable defensive effort in the sequence (and it's no coincidence) coming in an all too rare good overall performance.

We've signed a running HB.

indeed. but we needed a controlling half back