No- you didn't read it right- I said he had a strop cause he realised Leeds had dropped a point. Keep trying with the reading though. The comprehension needs a bit of work.

Thanks for the concern.


I read it exactly as you wrote it, you clearly "know" that Hardaker was upset at dropping a point and not upset because he was bitten.


BTW way I have not idea if he attempted to bite him and to be honest I'm not really bothered.

Does look very dodgy on TV footage especially with Hardakers reaction to it

Of course he was bitten....DISGUSTING. See videos on Facebook if you doubt it. He MIGHT get away with it because Gary Hetherington cares too much about RL and will possibly not want to tarnish its name.

Good job the Udders were playing the Rhinos, or they would have one player with a long suspension ! ( there should in fact be two as gob er Brough should have been shown a red for what he did during and after the game.

which facebook site is it on?

Someone posted it on my wall earlier and it looks even more evident as it's zoomed in. Surprised if it gets a mention though.

I feel like Hardaker was a little annoyed as he felt Connor was offside and expected a penalty, when that didn't come and Connor was sill at him Hardaker lashed out a little. That's how I saw it. Hardakers previous is colouring people's view of him these days and I don't think he can complain about that. Sent home from the England squad, 'involved' in an assault, banned for unacceptable language etc. It just makes people jump to conclusions whenever he does the slightest thing now and he'll have to deal with that.

Well you would as he plays for Leeds. So that's it then, it didn't happen as he's got a previous record for being a bit of a pest? I presume Simms didn't drop his forearm on Sinfield's face last week either?

jake shouldn't have got involved with the niggling, but as for a bite?? i have watched it back and not seen anything to suggest he has been bitten.

if... if he has then connor should face a few games sat at home, it would be interesting to see what the MRP thinks about it on monday.
if there is no bite there then maybe it's just trying to hide the fact that hardaker was lucky not to concede a penalty for striking..saying that though connor should have walked away and not let the niggle get to him.

bit.ly/1c42p7o brough saying there player was biten not zak having a laugh

bit.ly/1c42p7o brough saying there player was biten not zak having a laugh

Brilliant, Brough trying to turn tables after Conner is called out on social media. Pathetic from the Gaints. Should be funny to see what comes out of this. Gaints fans have already said there was no bite in the incident (in their opinion). Let's see if they do a massive 180.

and we have all said that if there was a bite then jake should be looking at a long ban, but there simply isn't enough evidence out there, on still or moving pictures to conclusively show there was a bite.

obviously the MRP will have different camera angles etc to be able to make that decision.

After Jake is called out on social media? What a thread on rlfans I doubt very much the "giants" are bothered about unsubstantiated claims from fans on here.
As I've already said if jake bit someone, he should be banned. The panel will look at it and make a decision regardless of what anyone on "social media" thinks.

Looking very "tasty" when the Giants and Brough come to HQ soon