Can anyone tell my why the starting wingers next year won't be Smith and Hall? Then we have Watkins fighting for a backs shirt before we have to dip into the academy.

Calders was good while it lasted, but is very much yesterday's man now.

Good question.

My guess it will go unanswered.

I would direct you back to me starting post.

Im not pro Caldy here, just saying that if we were looking for some speed to replace Donald he [imay [/ibe an option.

On the Watkins point I said, he is a centre, whats to really be gained by playing him on the wing? Id rather loan him to Salford (for example) if they wanted a centre.

As for Smith. I expect him, and Hall, to be the starting wingers.

My point, because for some they seem to be unable to grasp it is this;

IF we wanted a pacy winger Caldy MIGHT be an OPTION to replace Donald in the SQUAD. Im not suggesting we knight him and give him Blueys job, just that as a free agent he may be good in the squad and provide us with somemore option.

Caldy?!! Best mates are you?

I would have a fit and on form Calderwood in an instant over those two.

But whether he was up to been fully fit again would be up to the medical team to decide, and I would presume by the fact Hull have released him, that their medical team have already decided the answer to that.

Quote: thebloodbath "icon_lol.gif That's a fully fit Mark Calderwood (2005) against a fully fit Ryan Hall (2009). Even with the benefit of the better centre, I know which one I would prefer. www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2010

Quote: thebloodbath "icon_lol.gif That's a fully fit Mark Calderwood (2005) against a fully fit Ryan Hall (2009). Even with the benefit of the better centre, I know which one I would prefer. www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2010

calders was a great player for us whilst he was at the club and i will never forget his contribution to the great revival at that same time,but in regards him coming back,then no chance i'm afraid

rlCalderwood by plenty!rl