Well said

I did hear scruton on way back but bailey and ablett going in other direction

Unlikely. Ablett signed a long-term deal lastb year didn't he?

Hope so, Would swap Bailey for Scruton though

Heard bailey has been offered to bradford. But to make it fair they also want peacock and £100k

What's the big thing about Scruton?

He's decent and we should never have let go, but lets be honest, he wasn't even the Bulls best prop in a poor season.

There is better out there certainly to not just go fawning over one player.

Indeed! sika Manu and jared waeara Hargreaves are both available and miles better than any English props who are out of contract.

Totally agree. Scruton is a decent enough prop but wouldnt make any particular major difference to the squad we have. Personally wouldnt swap Bailey for him myself and would certainly prefer to look at other options rather than bring him back.

Remember he was only a rotational prop when here who was in and out of the 17 and injured too often.

McAvoy yes, but you are wrong about the other two. O'Neill was injured a lot but still played a fair bit, and Millard must have played in most games rotated with Diskin.

No he is not being generous, they were all signed by Leeds, number of appearances makes no difference.

Who in the squad did you want replacing over the last 3 years?

Well just to show up your lack of knowledge once more, Millard made 26 appearances in 2006. Hardly featured?
What does Thackray leaving after 1 year got to do with anything?
Eastwood has made 15 appearances this season plus cup games plus playoffs.

Now, as TS has pointed out, what has all this got to do with your original post where you said that Leeds have "hardly signed anyone" over the last few years?

Coming from the softcock end who set up a username with the sole purpose of trolling Leeds fans.

Would love to see Scruton return to Leeds.

If the cost was losing Bailey and Ablett, it's a price I'd be willing to pay.

Would Scruton accept the pay cut though?

Seriously?

You regard Scruton that highly that even though we are already likely to be a front rower light at the start of next season and will be losing a back-rower at the end of the year you'd happily sacrifice two more forwards just to get him back?

He's a solid player, but not worth two of anyone's first choice 17 in exchange IMO.