FORUMS > Leeds Rhinos > O/T Cas Wildcats |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Andy Gilder "Unlucky bewildered, your well thought out post got stuck in the middle of a bunch of gompers trying to be funny.'"
Indeed it did.
Quote: Andy Gilder "IIRC haven't the RFL already made reference to sides needing to be further on with new stadia than just outline planning permission when the next round of licence applications go in?'"
Yes they have, but suspect that as long as they can demonstrate they have things sorted contractually then the RFL are likely to accept that as sufficient to grant one of both of them another 3 years... BUT if still not sorted by the time after next, they are both chocolate ducked!!!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2176 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2014 | May 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: bewildered "I do think a shared ground would be the more ideal structure for both clubs. For such small local clubs the added revenue of having the stadium in constant use throughout the season would be beneficial to both clubs allowing them to possibly free up cash to plough into the squad and become more competitive. They could do what the Milan football teams do in the San Siro and have their own ends of the ground.
However i feel this would be something both sets of fans wont agree on. I think the main reason been the stadiums location. I know this means allot but in hindsight they should think about whats best for their clubs. i hear a lot of Wakey fans refusing to move to the Cas site thats been proposed because its not part of wakefield. But the proposed site of the new wakey ground is practically in leeds so whats the big problem? I know the same argument comes out all the time "how would you feel about ground sharing with Bradford?". Well I wouldnt like it but i know thats not going to happen as we arent in a position to have to do that. However if we had to for the sake of the club then so be it'"
Pretty much agree with all of that.
I know I've been a bit naughty in the past saying that they should merge but even ground sharing seems unreasonable to the two sets of fans.
It's a shame because one ground, two clubs halves the cost doesnt it? Makes both clubs stronger straight from the off.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 17230 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "To be fair Gotcha and I am not having a go at you, you need to know more of the facts before making a call like that as it is not just that simple... in fact it is really complex. The Newmarket scheme would be the one I would back and the one I think Wakefield Council want to back and will back! I am happy to tell you why, but it would be a long post and to be fair many might not be interested on this board.
My gut is telling me that the talks are really all about Cas dropping there plans and moving into the new community stadium at Newmarket, alongside Wakefield, whom have already agreed a deal with the Community Trust and the developer.'"
Don't worry I take no offence from it. You are from that industry, and will know a damn site more than me on it.
I have seen your posts previously on it, and can understand why they council would prefer the Newmarket site. Personally though, I don't think that will go through without time wasting oppossition. And I don't think the RFL should wait that long for assurances.
Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "I also think that a merger is not the right way to go (Ground share fine though) and that Cas might be faced with, and possibly chose to stay put and drop out of SL and still play as Cas in the National League.'"
I do think it would work though, and I think the RFL should enforce it. I notice how you only mention Cas in that statement though. In all honesty I think Cas bring more to the game, and would be better for the game, than Wakefield do. Of course that's my opinion though.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 28186 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2016 | Aug 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Gotcha "I do think it would work though, and I think the RFL should enforce it. I notice how you only mention Cas in that statement though. In all honesty I think Cas bring more to the game, and would be better for the game, than Wakefield do. Of course that's my opinion though.'"
A true merger would result in more than 50% of the fans of each club walking away rather than watch a merged side IMO, leaving the new club with a shiny new stadium and nobody sitting in it.
How many true mergers have their been in RL over the last 20-30 years, rather than what have in effect been takeovers?
Wests is probably the only one that springs to mind where the identity of both teams was retained. St George was in effect a takeover with the sop of retaining a couple of games at Illawarra and the name, likewise Hull FC-Gateshead and Huddersfield-Sheffield.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 17230 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Andy Gilder "A true merger would result in more than 50% of the fans of each club walking away rather than watch a merged side IMO, leaving the new club with a shiny new stadium and nobody sitting in it.
How many true mergers have their been in RL over the last 20-30 years, rather than what have in effect been takeovers?
Wests is probably the only one that springs to mind where the identity of both teams was retained. St George was in effect a takeover with the sop of retaining a couple of games at Illawarra and the name, likewise Hull FC-Gateshead and Huddersfield-Sheffield.'"
We had this a couple of months back. It's all opinions. What you have with Cas and Wakefield is nothing like Hull -Gateshead, or Huddersfield-Sheffield. It is a completely different scenario.
And yes, you are right to say initial opinion would be against. But I am 100% convinced that if enforced by the RFL it would prove a success. It certainly would be an improvement on what we have now.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 28186 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2016 | Aug 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Gotcha "We had this a couple of months back. It's all opinions. What you have with Cas and Wakefield is nothing like Hull -Gateshead, or Huddersfield-Sheffield. It is a completely different scenario'"
Which was my point - in the other two cases you had a bigger team effectively taking over a weaker one and retaining its own identity, ground, fanbase etc with a couple of cosmetic changes.
If you're talking about a true merger of Cas and Wakefield to create a brand new "third party" club such as Calder, then (IMO) it won't carry any of those things from either Cas or Wakefield and will be starting again almost from scratch having alienated a large percentage of its potential target audience (rugby league fans in the Five Towns area).
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 17230 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Andy Gilder "If you're talking about a true merger of Cas and Wakefield to create a brand new "third party" club such as Calder, then (IMO) it won't carry any of those things from either Cas or Wakefield and will be starting again almost from scratch having alienated a large percentage of its potential target audience (rugby league fans in the Five Towns area).'"
Which is the bit where opinions are all subjective.
If the RFL enforced a merger and gave no membership to any offsprings, there is no doubt in my mind that it would work. They love their RL down in Cas, and despite it been a minority in Wakefield the diehards love it there too. They may give initial oppossition but they would go in the end.
Neither club as it stands is doing anything more than making up the numbers, yet Cas fans especially continue to go. The game would be far better with the one merged club. I see no benefit in either as a singular club in super league.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 22289 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| There will be no enforced merger by the RFL, IMO.
It's a matter for Castleford and Wakefield to sort out between them and merger, I imagine, would be low down both club's lists.
An agreed site for a groundshare appears the logical way forward.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 28186 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2016 | Aug 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: tvoc "There will be no enforced merger by the RFL, IMO.'"
The RFL wouldn't want the publicity that would ensue from effectively closing two businesses and making people redundant
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 559 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2013 | Mar 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Think best way forward is for the Fev Fan (s) to mediate on this and draw this to a swift conclusion.
All 3 clubs could merge though
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 9208 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote: Andy Gilder "The RFL wouldn't want the publicity that would ensue from effectively closing two businesses and making people redundant'"
Just blame the tories.
Works everytime.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 11658 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2018 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Castlefield Wildtigers – has a ring to it don’t you think?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 22777 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Andy Gilder "A true merger would result in more than 50% of the fans of each club walking away rather than watch a merged side IMO, leaving the new club with a shiny new stadium and nobody sitting in it.
How many true mergers have their been in RL over the last 20-30 years, rather than what have in effect been takeovers?
Wests is probably the only one that springs to mind where the identity of both teams was retained. St George was in effect a takeover with the sop of retaining a couple of games at Illawarra and the name, likewise Hull FC-Gateshead and Huddersfield-Sheffield.'"
maybe for now, but in 10 years?
maybe a merged club would only have 5-6k now, but with a bit of success a fair few would come back, and the kids now (who are the important ones) have little loyalty, in 5-10 years when they become young adults they wont really know anything other than a one club city, and their kids will never have known a 2 club city of wakefield.
the question isnt really what is best for both clubs right now, but what is best for the sport in the district for the future
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 22777 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Andy Gilder "The RFL wouldn't want the publicity that would ensue from effectively closing two businesses and making people redundant'" maybe £1/£2Million to the owners would help, they may not be forcing but greasing the wheels im sure
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 18299 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote: SmokeyTA "maybe £1/£2Million to the owners would help, they may not be forcing but greasing the wheels im sure'"
I like it kinky.
|
|
|
|
|
|