Stop been chilidsh and ruining threads.

Why not grow up and contribute something meaningful to a thread? let's start here.

Can you explain the reasons for the below how you would agree with it?

Leuluai: 89 - 13 (6.85) - 21 - 3 (88%) - 1 – 1 awarded a 7
Diskin: 37 - 9 (4.11) - 26 - 1 (96%) - 2 – 0 awarded a 6
Kirke: 15 - 7 (2.14) - 35 - 3 (92%) - 0 – 1 awarded a 8
Sinfield: 81 - 14 (5.79) - 40 - 3 (93%) - 1 – 3 awarded a 5

Burgess: 73 - 11 (6.64) - 26 - 4 (87%) - 0 – 1 awarded a 6
Peacock: 124 - 18 (6.89) - 30 - 1 (97%) - 0 – 1 awarded a 6


My argument on this thread is giving a player a 5 when there was such high work rate. What have the others above on those stats done to acheive the difference in rating?

Gotcha

Why dont you do the ratings for the Wakey match

and lets see what you give


I look forward to seeing them

Why? I am in agreement with most of David's anyway and think he does a good job. I have already stated I only dissagree with the Sinfield mark and backed up why. I thought David provided this as a matter for debate? he's got no problem in people dissagreeing with him and actually welcomes discussion on it. So what's the problem?

RE: Sinfield but in your words "he had a poor game" yet you wanting a higher mark, confused.com

Technically true, but in reality not.

There are 12 places in the defensive line, and each will receive a different amount of work at any one time.

For someone to achieve the high tackle stats (and Sinny does it consistently), you put yourslef close to the ruck in the defensive line, so that you take up most traffic.

do these players then take on the responsibility for moving the team around the pitch too.

Also, I reckon that any decent player in the salford team could rack up 50+ tackles in a game the amount of defense they probably have to do

no, as that only meets 50% of his game, he has to have a quality game with ball in hand to get a better mark

dont get me wrong, its a good achievement (well for Super League standards....) however he had a 'mare n half attacking

Lawrie versus Gotcha.

Clash of the Titans.

Plato versus Aristotle it is not.

Doesn't mean its not worth discussing.

It's not even an argument, considering it appears he is in agreement with me.

Do you want to contribute anything worthwhile? I asked above for something from Soprano, but he's not willing when worthwhile contributions are required. Perhaps you are?

In a discussion with you I am not sure it's worth the effort.

I have a squash game to head for. Maybe catch you on the flip.

I dont agree with you, thats the whole point