Incidental, accidental contact then. As determined by people who actually watched the incident from a number of angles, rather than just pulled up a selective still to support their agenda.

Who'd have thunk it?

Surprisingly, no such fuss about Willie Isa's two attempts to pull the arms of Cas players, which have actually led to charges...

We all knew it was just sh*t-stirring from poor losers.
No mention of the cheap-shot late hit on Sinfield by Harrison (I think).

Thought it was England who caught Sinfield late?
Did he escape any punishment for that one by any chance?

It was looked at and the panel said it was worthy of a penalty at the time but no further action.

Bit of a kick in the backside for the referee and both touch judges, who didn't even give a penalty despite having time to consult with the VR if they wanted to.

Fair enough. Looked a tad late but maybe not malicious.
Unlike Hardaker who tried to remove Hills eye ball and whispering homophobic words into his ear at the same time.
Apparently Hardaker is the worse thing ever to grace a rugby pitch.

Picture in the YEP today of when Briscoe scores and Sutcliffe hugs him and Hardaker jumps on Sutcliffe's back and his finger looks to be right in Sutcliffe's eye......so he even attacks his own guys lol

I blame Sinfield's thug like influence

You've lead a one man campaign to try and get Zak banned, but it hasn't worked.

You mischievous k unt.

Haha. One man campaign? Nonsense. I didn't particularly want him to get banned. I gave my opinion that I think he should, but that doesn't mean I strongly felt that I wanted him too.

I gave an opinion, the RFL don't agree, I've moved on. You probably should too.

Now you really are being ridiculous. I have no alias on here. I gave my opinion at the time using this username.

Yes I wanted to start discussion on the incident, because I hadn't seen it being discussed anywhere else. Surely the whole point in these forums is to discuss these kind of things?

If it was a role reversal and a Warrington player had done it to Sinfield for example, would you be so against it being discussed as you are now? I very much doubt it.

It's such a sad state of affairs when somebody can't have an opinion that differs from the majority without being subjected to abuse.

You're such a xenophobic lot. Very, very sad.

Warrington forum - Hey guys, look at what zak did, big ban don't you think?

Saints forum - Hey guys, look at what zak did, big ban don't you think?

Wigan forum - Hey guys, look at what zak did, big ban don't you think?

Leeds forum - Hey guys, look at what zak did, big ban don't you think?

If a warrington player did it to sinfield, i'd discuss it in the relevant thread or start a thread on the leeds board if one hadn't been done already. I wouldn't run around, starting threads on just about every main rivals forum, complete with selective photo evidence and loaded question.

It's blatantly obvious to anyone what you were up to.

I started one on the Leeds and Warrington boards as they were the two teams involved. I started one on the Saints board as I am a Saints fan. I didn't mention anything on the Wigan board.

So my crime is starting numerous threads, as opposed to simply thinking he should have been banned?

Even some of the saints fans were slightly bemused as to why it was on their board.