They're on their 4th page already, moaning thats it's at hudds. It was the logical choice as gotcha has being trying to tell them. As is the norm with the pie's they're too busy moaning about how hard done to they are to listen.

well its not long since they weren't good enough to get to one,until the okey pokey started up again

so long as they keep it on their own board dont want em over here

I see that if Leeds meet Hudds in the final, Lunt wouldn't be allowed to play. I really don't understand clubs being allowed to enter such side agreements to loan deals - if a player is on loan they should be available for every game during that time, unless cup-tied.

Do they?

I'm afraid I disagree. Were, for example, Lunt to play for us against Hudds and have a Meli-esque type shocker or worse there'd always be the suspicion of skullduggery, at least in some quarters.

He believes they do, he didn't say they did.

Do they?

Hudds is about 40 miles from Wigan. What's the big deal?
Is there some kind Heathrow style passport control on the county border that I am not aware of.

Every fule know that Huddersfield is just an outer suburb of Greater Leeds.

Christ (sorry kirkstaller) that thread on the Pie forum is a piece of work. They're even getting uppity when one of their unexpectedly non-humourless fans makes a little joke

God forbid Leeds have to play a tie outside of Yorkshire. I'd have no problem with going to the Galpharm. But if the Galpharm isn't available on that day and that's when the BBC want it then why not just make life easier for everybody all round and just play it elsewhere instead? Are the RFL that desperate for this to be played at Huddersfield?'"

Wigan fans make their own rules up as they go along. Completely brain dead set of morons.

I notice the deathly silence about the kick out from Tomkins at the weekend on Makinson. Yet when Senior did it the other year he should have been jailed.

Or on the flip side could score the winning touchline kick ala Liam Botham when we loaned him to Wigan