I'll take your word for it and won't make any suggestions that it was Freudian. However, and please don't get all excited that this is directed at you, but I have well stated theories about when people have a problem with Bailey playing the hard man yet love player's like Peacock, Morley and Barrie Mac to take that role.

I won't go any further into those theories as the last time I aired them it led to the disappearance of a fun poster from Wigan who protested a little too much.

Dr Shipman would disagree.

If the cap fits. Attempting to make out that a typo was a racial remark is at the very least childish IMO. Are you saying its ok in your book?

We obviously have quite different views of Joel Tomkins. I see a good player who has a nasty side. Even his brother Sam says he likes a fight. It will be interesting to hear other peoples opinions rather than just your and mine.

I think Joel Tompkins is a dirty b*gger but I'd have him in the Leeds side in the blink of an eye.
Likewise James Graham or Roby.
The beauty of the salary cap is that such talent has to be spread around or even go to Australia.

If you want to keep pushing the issue I'll happily clarify my views on why I believe racism defines a lot of posters views on Bailey. I've set out my arguments before and I believe in them, no matter how aggressively those I accuse respond.

If you're unsure how you type "niggly" I'd have thought the leased you would have done is exercised some judgment and checked before using your typing. If I am childish you were reckless, thoughtless and a little bit ignorant.

You're also childish as your response to TVOC suggests it's ok to be childish because I was, apparantly.

Grow up.

I don't have to justify myself to you. You should think very carefully before making serious accusations based on nothing more than a typo. I don't defend deliberate foul play nor will I have anything to do with opinions that are racist.

You chose to make a cheap and insulting comment on what is an argument about rugby matters.

I note that you haven't apologised but make matters worse. If you didn't want to make "any suggestions that it was Freudian" then why mention it?

Cheap shot G1.. bit like cheap shot Bailey.

I am not interested in your odd views or your bullying style. If I applied your simplistic logic to your "agenda" regarding Buderus you could say you were being racist against Australians. See how stupid it is!

Well they are all good players.

Ha ha. Two typos in your self righteous outburst.

What were you saying about typos....ah yes.... "exercised some judgment and checked before using your typing. If I am childish you were reckless, thoughtless and a little bit ignorant" Well aagin if the cap fits!

The word I mis-typed isn't even a word and in the context of my sentence could in no way be conceived as a racist slur as I was talking also about Cross. Unless of course the reader had an agenda.

Agree regarding roby and graham but not tomkins. If we are swapping him for hauraki I'd be all for It but we are fairly strong In the Sr

But does the cap fit?

I can only ever recount you (and just this once) offering that opinion of any of my posts on here.

I presume you'll be able to back your 'Salford' remark up with some evidence?

Cheers

Yet you follow it up with three or four consecutive posts on the subject.

I shall leave it there. Let me know what you seek an apology for and I'll give it due consideration.