Can I transfer from the paracetamol and get some of what mutley cat is on? They're hallucogenic and make you talk in riddles or simply repeat what someone just said but make you argue it anyway.

Thats the sum of his posts on this board the last few days.

TBF I feel like I have been repeating the same stuff to the majority over that period of time. It's like banging your head against a brick wall (or in Damo's case just a brick) trying to get through to them.

i would love to see a try scored from a scrum that gets refered and the vid ref chalk it off for feeding!! that would be a thred really worth having!! or maybe not

So... please explain exactly why Burrow's try was disallowed – I believe it was something to do with a Frenchman, a Kiwi and a failed attempt to retract appropriately.

...or the same scenario from an incorrect PTB (which, by the rule book, 99% of them are these days)

great comeback , but at least you've been educated a little

Actually a ruling was brought in a couple of years back where you only have to make an attempt at playing it now and the foot doesnt have to touch. Obv if you just roll the ball through without ever moving your feet its an automatic penalty.

How many of them are ignored in a match???

I'm more concerned that on Friday the Ref was telling he Video Ref what to do, rather than asking his advice.

IMO Smith used the 'big screen' to confirm Webb was offside and then told Halibut to declare 'No Try' and then late in the game told Halibut it was a knock on. IMO if a knock on is caught in front by a player from the same side, it's a forward pass, and you cannot rule against that using Video.

Anyway, we lost. Bulls won their cup final.

No more discussions from me re the loss.

Were you as concerned at MM when the Vidref was telling the ref on the field what to do? In an instruction (since shown to have been wrong anyway) which changed the outcome of the game. And especially when SL clubs had all been assured that that would never happen? If you are concerned about Mr Smith, you must surely have been incandescent over messrs. Klein & Ganson? Were you?

Were you making any allowance for the fact that M. Alibert's first language is not English, so he may have needed a bit more clarification about what was being asked of him than others would?

Also, just wondering how you gained the impression the ref should have been asking the vidref for "advice", when it was the vidref ti actually make the decision?

Just curious...

I stand corrected big fella.