the new Witch hunt has also started on trlrfs too

Getting accidentally caught under the eye is not the same as gouging. HTH.

BURN HIM

Absolutely NO PROOF that the swollen eye was due to that tackle. $hit stirring of the highest order by $hithouse supporters.

Not at all. I was merely putting it out there and seeing what people made of it.

Match review panel only has access to video. They don't consider photography so this photo proves nothing

no you didn't you did it for the same reason that it is being done on the other forum

You can make assumptions about me all you like but I did it to see what you all made of it and because I hadn't seen it mentioned already.

Also interesting one of the reactions on your post on the warrington forum which you dont appear to have answered. Take a look at the position of Zaks head. To gouge a player you'd need to look where your hand is, he's looking in a completely different direction

I disagree. I could stand behind someone and quite easily locate his eye with my finger. You don't have to be looking at him; that's quite naive of you.

That's why you started the thread with "he could be looking at a long ban"



Looking at the video, I think he reaches around trying to hit and dislodge the ball but ends up finding the face of Hill.

Oh ok, I'm just naive. of course why didn't I see that tsk