Can't argue with any of that DHM hopefully ablett and jjb's pay is lighter this week because everyone knows what you get with ganson yet do the same stupid stuff when he refs!

The win glosses over a very poor performance. A lot of basic errors, forcing the ball and poor control of the ruck.We looked poorly coached for much of the game.

Cant be too disappointed with the victory but with 8 minutes to go I was abslutely fuming with how we'd played.

Would like to see the calls from Ganson again as I didnt think they were as bad as Leeds fans made out.

They have to put it behind them, but you could see from Sinny that it's getting very frustrating. We are actually one of the cleaner sides at the PTB, we do a lot of restling with the man off the ground but usually clear the ruck once the man is tackled very quickly.
But the main problem tonight was mistakes. Fumbles at key moments and then poor organisation in defence - especially when Burges, Diskin and Worrall are near each other - we leave big holes. Obst's try was a clear example of this, Burrow was isolated and had 5 yards clear space on either side of him in the defensive line right on our try line.
This is not a reffing issue.

I nearly cried when Lauatiti only had to pick the ball up to score and he bloody knocked it on

Because he didn't shout held for the Wakey one but he very clearly did for the Leeds one (and Leeds just kept on carrying). I can't remember the other ones you mention but so far as I can remember I think there was only one decision Ganson made against you which was wrong. He missed a few that should have been against you and Wakey, and he got one wrong for Wakey also (a knock on which was actually an illegal steal by Leeds).

btw, one of your tries was off a forward pass. Even Stevo admitted it.

Oh the irony from a saints fan!!

reading some comments of the wakey board they feel Ganson lost them the match by giving US penalty's. We had 2!

Thanks for pointing out the obvious - the question of course is why he didn't call held when Ablett's feet were clearly off the ground. But then you knew that didn't you? You couldn't be so pig thick as to not know that, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt there.

Interesting to hear Bluey's referring to Ganson as THAT MAN! It is quite obvious that he wants to wind the lads up by some calls and we should know he has a small man's syndrome and play him accordingly. Interesting that we have him everytime we get close to Stains or when we need to be brought back to the pack.

good grief