Are you dyslexic as well as dysfunctional?

Where did he say Barnes Wallace did?

Perhaps , perhaps his friends father was a air fitter, or a gunner, or any of the other mutlitude of roles that could be bitten/harassed by Gibson's dog. perhaps it was forever getting them in trouble so they hated it.

How the hell would we know?

I don't know what your moral crusade is all about but you've made some pretty blindingly daft statements on here.

Are you Bang in disguise?

Here



It does fairly improbable though that Gibson would urinate on his own dogs grave.

I interpreted that as meaning his mates dad worked with Gibson and Wallace and it was his mates dad and his work mates that hated the dog, not Gibson and Wallace who hated the dog.

QED, cheers G1.

I interpreted as Gibson and Wallace peeing on the grave.
If that isn`t the case then I apologise.

I'm confused here. You thought Gibson peed on his dog's grave? Why would he do that?

"Do you recognise the sacrifice of all the elderly soldiers in your area who sit at home alone for days on end. Who struggle to heat their homes, struggle to get by on a day to day basis? "


"But either way, no need for getting on your high horse about those who don't pander to your expectations of gratitude towards a generation that to be fair has done very little to make any impact on the youth of today other than to tell them they are "Thugs" "Scoundrels" and refuse to give them their ball back. "

LTID, Nothing like consistancy eh ?

To finally try and clear things up. The only reason i started this thread was to try and find out if people think that it ok to alter historical fact in films, for entertainment or any other reason. The dog`s name was an example,as it is a current film I could have used "U571" "Braveheart" or "Titanic" and did mention "Zulu".
The main point I feel strongly about, is that fact is fact, and if you make a film refering to actual people and events you have a reponsibility to portray them as acuratley as possible.
Other wise make a fictional film based on events like "Memphis Belle".

Of course, I can see how asking a Paramedic with 20 years experience to respect the elderly is the same as asking the "youth of today" to do so.

What I don't see is the "youth of today" on a soap box talking about the stocks and portaloos as punishment for desecration of monuments to sacrifice! The same of which can not be said of certain Paramedic with 20 years in the job.

Ah, yes on second thoughts you're probably right.