rlNo wonder Senior was a bit tetchyrl, is it a St Helens thing?

ooh.

Did Senior nick the carpet he got 10/10 on. That must be worth a bit.

I think the majority of culpability lies with Bailey.

Even if we accept you're right that Senior over committed (which I don't) Bailey must still slide across and close the gap. He cannot take the play off.

Again, accepting your version, Keith was taking positive action, Bailey took the play off.

I still think Senior needs to learn how to slap properly

Agreed. It was lazy lazy defence by Bailey.

And looking at it againit looks as if Senior told Bailey that he was having a real old go at him.

No charge or warning for Webb's grapple tackle?

Ok, predictions!

Senior - Warning for conduct and taking things into his own hands after an illegal play by Wilkin, Sin-bin sufficient.

Kylie - Warning and possibly a fine, no suspension.

JJB - Given Paul Cooke I suspect this will be a large fine and warning or a one match ban and warning.

Kylie's was really bad. It was right in front of us. Hopefully his previous good conduct will work for him though.

That is why I think he will get warning and fine... possibly told that if he does it again in play-offs he will get a suspension!

Is that open to them though? From my quick reading of the disicplinary sheet, if found guilty Keith faces between a 1 and 4 game suspension. Unless he has the jury that let Steven Gerrard off, he's going to be found guilty. So won't that mean a minimum 1 game ban?

As far as I am aware yes. They review panel rank the offence if refering it to the disiplinary panel, and they have ranked it as a grade C offence and therefore the maximum ban is 4 matches and the minimum is 1 IF they choose to impose a ban?

Interesting:

Allegedly Keith Senior had received negative remarks on his Ebay account from a Mr Wilkin but it was the Leeds man who had the last laugh at Headingley.

That's the point here. It's only an if and not mandatory as cases from earlier in the season clearly showed.

There was one I followed (can't remember who or why at this moment) where a warning letter was issued then almost immediately the same player was up for the same offence, found guilty with a 1 - 4 tariff and walked away with just a fine.