Quoting Peter smiths opinion is the dictionary definition of straw clutching.

Fully expecting Blease to have 'The Momster' on notice for next season, he's just so far below what is expected from an NRL centre it's actually ridiculous.

Hardly alone in that regard.
Miller and Frawley haven't really covered themselves in glory and they got a preseason in.

I think there are alot of things to sort for next year and the top two have to be coach and the pack.
Imo it feels like another " three year rebuild" all over again, which was always a danger with a less experienced coach and so many project signings

I know it was just a bit of fun Exeter .
We’ve got to be careful though, if we start calling him “The Momster”, the South Stand may think it’s okay to tell us “Sam Lisone’s the best on earth”, and before we know it these crazy nicknames and songs may spiral well out of control. In fairness to you, there’s more chance of our current number 4 being a “Momster” than the ludicrous Sam Lisone claims.

Do me a favour Oledski couldn't bust his way through a wet paper bag our hardest carrier of the ball is O'connor also if Eseeh Jr is as rubbish as you make out why is the coach starting him? Instead of say Sangare or Lisone?

Our pack has been at or under average this season, but actually I think with some tactical switches we'll see more from them. We definitely need 2 more real high quality big physcial things in there though.

I'm not sure all is rosy once the pack is sorted though. I really don't think our centres have been great most of the season. For a club with heritage centres like Innes, Iro, Senior, Moon, Godden etc. I just think the current two are poor. Coupled with Miller's mistakes and whenever the pack has worked hard to get us position, we have typically wasted opportunities.

Really interesting to hear Arthur take our performances apart, he is spot on. His comments to imply that RS left a bit of chaos in the playing systems for sure, I don't think he's a fan of how the side is trying to play.

He’s not on his own, there’s been lots of us for a long time now. The fundamentals of the game remain territory and possession, we’ve been playing neither and expecting to get results from miracle plays.

The pack are responsible to get us up the park and keep us there, and the backs for scoring, that hasn’t really changed in 100 years.

Our pack needs sorting then we can tweak the other bits that need attention. BA knows this far better than anyone on here does.

What do you mean "keep him" exactly? Do you have some Intel?

The penny is dropping jim, welcome to the party Maybe career coach Rohan didn't 'know best', and those 'who actually know anything' (as you said) can't really give any tangible examples of the 'good things' he left behind.

I’m getting very bored of the constant “I told you sos” on here. All I have personally ever done is provide what I believe to be an even viewpoint based on the evidence. This has included being critical of RS where required. If you guys can’t accept any other viewpoint than your own you make this board feel like a school playground.

Sorry Jim but you seemed to enjoy telling me and others we knew nothing so right back at ya. Tig you're it

No intel.

It’s fairly obvious what I mean isn’t it?

Either kept him on loan or if he stayed with us long term, he’s a decent prospect but he’s not the player you are making him out to be yet.

Your denigration of Oledski is a bit weird to be honest, plays big minutes, rarely injured and constantly makes big metres and tackles a lot.

I noticed Arthur pointed out that Oledski is a player "he enjoys coaching" in his presser.

Mik is the only prop we have that can play to the right standard. I wish he had a bit of mongrel in him, but he’s the only one who consistently makes post contact metres and tops the stats for props every week.if we had three more like him we wouldn’t be in this mess.