FORUMS FORUMS



  
FORUMS > Leeds Rhinos > Wilf Rosenberg
206 posts in 15 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4934
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2022Dec 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Damo-Leeds "I guess that you two won’t be on each others Christmas cards list?
He thinks Christmas is only for left wingers!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach7376
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Juan Cornetto "He thinks Christmas is only for left wingers!'"

that reminds me of the chapter in the novel "THE RAGGED TROUSERED PHILANTHROPISTS"

RankPostsTeam
International Board Member22289
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200322 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Aug 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Juan Cornetto "Why do you choose to make things personal? Why would I like it to be in any theatre? '"


I don't. I'm debating the subjects.

You said the Typhoon isn't in theatre yet (which it is in the roles I identified) so I simply asked which theatres it has missed that you think it should have made since it came into service with the RAF?

Quote: Juan Cornetto "My point is that this aircraft has suffered from massive delays in production, major technical problems to such an extent that it has not been deployed in any of the wars we are, and have been, engaged in. There are still doubts about its reliability and futher doubts about its future role as it is now not up with the best in class.'"


So name the wars it has been held back from and the roles it should have been fulfilling in them.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "
What is it with you? When you are confronted with facts that question your one-eyed viewpoint you either disagree but fail to say why (even when asked several times) or you come up with spurious comments like these.'"


'Facts' like the Typhoon isn't a supercruising aircraft or the RAF have difficulty getting it flying off the ground. Those sort of facts?

Quote: Juan Cornetto "We have been discussing the pros and cons of a particular aircraft and not the RAF. In doing so I have made comparisons which show the F22 to be the better aircraft so these are not "ridiculous irrelevant comparisons" '"


It's irrelevant to this discussion because the F22 is not now and probably never will be in the future part of the RAF's inventory nor will it likely fall into the hands of an aggressor.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "With regard to my comment about "they have enough problems getting them off the ground let alone an aircraft carrier" you know full well this was in the context with my points about the many technical problems that have been keeping the Typhoo out of service and nothing to do with the RAF. '"


It's in service. I see them flying in service every working day and have done for at least 3 years, probably longer. Where's your evidence that it isn't in service?

Quote: Juan Cornetto "May I remind you my son in-law is a front line Tornado pilot so do not dare suggest I have anything but the highest regard for him and his brave colleagues. The RAF deserve the best equipment and to say the Typhoon is not the best is a statement of fact and in no way undermines the reputation of the RAF. My whole point is that politicians, designers and manufacturers have let down the RAF!'"


Stating that the RAF are unable to fly one off the ground would suggests otherwise.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "For someone who is always quoting stats it appears you only like to use the ones that suit your own prejudice. 64 operational RAF Typhoons were grounded and priority checks were made on the quick reaction force and those stationed in the Falklands. All the Typhoons aircraft in Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria and Saudi Arabia were been taken out of service.'"


Taken out of service? More over-dramatisation, how is this furthering the discussion?

The article you posted was a minor issue concerning the Martin Baker Mk16A ejector seat. I don't believe it was an issue for the RAF Typhoons as such as the correct procedures for arming the seat were carried out through adherence to the manual (perhaps the Saudis should have come to Britain rather than go to Spain) the temporary cessation of training flights was only a procedural matter. The ban (which never effected operational flights) came in on the Wednesday for the training flights and was lifted five days later once all the paperwork was filed 3 working days later.

Your evidence of a serious problem with the Typhoon fell at the first hurdle and the Austrians agreeto discontinue exercise and training flights of the Eurofighter because of a perceived safety problem in the ejection seat.

This is a normal procedure to ensure safety.

The interruption was necessary because, if mishandled, the parachute could become separated from the ejection seat in case of ejection.

Pilots are being trained in the new procedures. Thereafter, the training and exercise operations are resumed.

This measure has no effect on the supervision and monitoring of air space.

Eurofighter will continue to carry out operational missions - so-called A-priority flights - and remains fully operational.


Quote: Juan Cornetto "No. Do you? '"


Yet you just did.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "They can both fly as low but the Harrier is no where near as fast or can take as large a payload, which is why the GR4 is the low level fast ground attack aircraft of choice for both the RAF & NATO.'"


And a capable platform it is too but without the flexibility of the Harrier. What size of aircraft package would it take for a Tornado to drop a bomb on the Falklands or to provide close air support to the troops on the ground should the Argentinians fancy taking the island again?

From the in house Conservative newspaper

What they are doing to the armed forces under the heading Strategic is anything but and while I expect no-one to listen to my concerns perhaps they should listen to those expressed by Dr Liam Fox - the coalition's defence secretary

Personal attack after personal attack but unlike you I'll just stick to the subject which is far more important if that's alright with you.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "You have no idea who I am a fan of so do not presume. It is certainly no surprise that you predict the doom and gloom of a Labour loser. I don't recall you predicting the mess that they have left us all in!'"


You quoted the IFS on page 7 of this thread.

How we got here is interesting but not as interesting as how we go forward from here.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "In a recent biography of Gordon Brown it appears that his inability to ever apologise or admit he was wrong stems back to his upbringing at the manse by his over strict father. That explains his troubled personality defects. What is your excuse?'"


Is there any need, really?

Quote: Juan Cornetto "It most certainly isn't. I only quoted from it as you only believe things from the left wing.'"


I have already quoted The Mail and The Telegraph (Theresa May and Liam Fox also) unless they are also on the left these days. I have no real need to quote from a paper who supported the Lib Dems at the last election.

More evidence of the direction we are taking:
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... ciety.html
Quote: Juan Cornetto "Why do you choose to make things personal? Why would I like it to be in any theatre? '"


I don't. I'm debating the subjects.

You said the Typhoon isn't in theatre yet (which it is in the roles I identified) so I simply asked which theatres it has missed that you think it should have made since it came into service with the RAF?

Quote: Juan Cornetto "My point is that this aircraft has suffered from massive delays in production, major technical problems to such an extent that it has not been deployed in any of the wars we are, and have been, engaged in. There are still doubts about its reliability and futher doubts about its future role as it is now not up with the best in class.'"


So name the wars it has been held back from and the roles it should have been fulfilling in them.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "
What is it with you? When you are confronted with facts that question your one-eyed viewpoint you either disagree but fail to say why (even when asked several times) or you come up with spurious comments like these.'"


'Facts' like the Typhoon isn't a supercruising aircraft or the RAF have difficulty getting it flying off the ground. Those sort of facts?

Quote: Juan Cornetto "We have been discussing the pros and cons of a particular aircraft and not the RAF. In doing so I have made comparisons which show the F22 to be the better aircraft so these are not "ridiculous irrelevant comparisons" '"


It's irrelevant to this discussion because the F22 is not now and probably never will be in the future part of the RAF's inventory nor will it likely fall into the hands of an aggressor.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "With regard to my comment about "they have enough problems getting them off the ground let alone an aircraft carrier" you know full well this was in the context with my points about the many technical problems that have been keeping the Typhoo out of service and nothing to do with the RAF. '"


It's in service. I see them flying in service every working day and have done for at least 3 years, probably longer. Where's your evidence that it isn't in service?

Quote: Juan Cornetto "May I remind you my son in-law is a front line Tornado pilot so do not dare suggest I have anything but the highest regard for him and his brave colleagues. The RAF deserve the best equipment and to say the Typhoon is not the best is a statement of fact and in no way undermines the reputation of the RAF. My whole point is that politicians, designers and manufacturers have let down the RAF!'"


Stating that the RAF are unable to fly one off the ground would suggests otherwise.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "For someone who is always quoting stats it appears you only like to use the ones that suit your own prejudice. 64 operational RAF Typhoons were grounded and priority checks were made on the quick reaction force and those stationed in the Falklands. All the Typhoons aircraft in Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria and Saudi Arabia were been taken out of service.'"


Taken out of service? More over-dramatisation, how is this furthering the discussion?

The article you posted was a minor issue concerning the Martin Baker Mk16A ejector seat. I don't believe it was an issue for the RAF Typhoons as such as the correct procedures for arming the seat were carried out through adherence to the manual (perhaps the Saudis should have come to Britain rather than go to Spain) the temporary cessation of training flights was only a procedural matter. The ban (which never effected operational flights) came in on the Wednesday for the training flights and was lifted five days later once all the paperwork was filed 3 working days later.

Your evidence of a serious problem with the Typhoon fell at the first hurdle and the Austrians agreeto discontinue exercise and training flights of the Eurofighter because of a perceived safety problem in the ejection seat.

This is a normal procedure to ensure safety.

The interruption was necessary because, if mishandled, the parachute could become separated from the ejection seat in case of ejection.

Pilots are being trained in the new procedures. Thereafter, the training and exercise operations are resumed.

This measure has no effect on the supervision and monitoring of air space.

Eurofighter will continue to carry out operational missions - so-called A-priority flights - and remains fully operational.


Quote: Juan Cornetto "No. Do you? '"


Yet you just did.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "They can both fly as low but the Harrier is no where near as fast or can take as large a payload, which is why the GR4 is the low level fast ground attack aircraft of choice for both the RAF & NATO.'"


And a capable platform it is too but without the flexibility of the Harrier. What size of aircraft package would it take for a Tornado to drop a bomb on the Falklands or to provide close air support to the troops on the ground should the Argentinians fancy taking the island again?

From the in house Conservative newspaper

What they are doing to the armed forces under the heading Strategic is anything but and while I expect no-one to listen to my concerns perhaps they should listen to those expressed by Dr Liam Fox - the coalition's defence secretary

Personal attack after personal attack but unlike you I'll just stick to the subject which is far more important if that's alright with you.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "You have no idea who I am a fan of so do not presume. It is certainly no surprise that you predict the doom and gloom of a Labour loser. I don't recall you predicting the mess that they have left us all in!'"


You quoted the IFS on page 7 of this thread.

How we got here is interesting but not as interesting as how we go forward from here.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "In a recent biography of Gordon Brown it appears that his inability to ever apologise or admit he was wrong stems back to his upbringing at the manse by his over strict father. That explains his troubled personality defects. What is your excuse?'"


Is there any need, really?

Quote: Juan Cornetto "It most certainly isn't. I only quoted from it as you only believe things from the left wing.'"


I have already quoted The Mail and The Telegraph (Theresa May and Liam Fox also) unless they are also on the left these days. I have no real need to quote from a paper who supported the Lib Dems at the last election.

More evidence of the direction we are taking:
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... ciety.html


RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4934
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2022Dec 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: tvoc "You said the Typhoon isn't in theatre yet (which it is in the roles I identified) so I simply asked which theatres it has missed that you think it should have made since it came into service with the RAF?

So name the wars it has been held back from and the roles it should have been fulfilling in them. '"


Theatre is short for theatre of war. We have been involved in a war situation in Afganistan and in Iraq since the Typhoon came into service yet it has not been deployed in either despite the announcement it was to go to Afganistan in 2007.

Quote: tvoc "'Facts' like the Typhoon isn't a supercruising aircraft or the RAF have difficulty getting it flying off the ground. Those sort of facts? '"


You are being pedantic. FACT

You choose to miss the relevance. My point was simply to say the Typhoon performance has been overtaken by other aircraft and in particular the F22. Therefore before committing more funds to buy future Typhoons we should consider buying the F22 off the peg.

Quote: tvoc "Stating that the RAF are unable to fly one off the ground would suggests otherwise. '"


I have answered your mis quote already and yet you persist with the same mis quote - very New Labour!

I did not say or imply the RAF are unable to fly off the ground period. What I said was "They have enough problems getting the Eurofighter to fly off land let alone a carrier." You may recall we had been discussing the delay and technical problems of the Typhoon which together with insufficent spares meant the Typhoons spent more time on the ground than in the air. The "they" is the manufacturers & Ministry of Defence procurement people and nothing to do with the RAF.


Quote: tvoc "Taken out of service? More over-dramatisation, how is this furthering the discussion? '"


Evidence of more technical problems which are keeping it on the ground

"The grounding order was made on Tuesday. Typhoon aircraft in Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria and Saudi Arabia have been taken out of service" Source

"Almost every aspect of the Tornado is superior to the Harrier, including 2 man crew, greater range, larger and more versatile payload, the gun (which is proving useful in Afghanistan since it replaced the Harrier), two engines, greater speed and loiter time and enhanced combat survivability. While the Harrier has rocket pods the Tornado carries two 27mm Mauser cannon for strafing, two crew that allows for greater targeting ability and can carry more fuel giving them more time over targets. The Tornado has a top speed of 990mph compared to the Harrier's 660mph.

The Harrier popularity is bouyed up almost always by hype because of it's almost unique VSTOL capability, which it rarely if ever uses to any advantage. The truth is the Harrier is a light weight, it is not the most agile, it hasn't got the range, it hasn't got the payload, indeed it hasn't got anything over the Tornado apart from viffing for the airshow crowds. That in itself hasn't much recently. Also, I understand the Harrier is closer to it's airframe sell by date? Another thing, the Harriers are much fewer in number. If it's simply a type that needs to go, well then I'm sure we'll miss the Harrier's operational capability least of all."

RankPostsTeam
International Board Member22289
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200322 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Aug 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Juan Cornetto "Theatre is short for theatre of war. We have been involved in a war situation in Afganistan and in Iraq since the Typhoon came into service yet it has not been deployed in either despite the announcement it was to go to Afganistan in 2007.'"


The Typhoon has entered service (despite you claiming it hasn't) in the air to air role. What role was there in either of those conflicts for an air superiority fighter? Not been committed to theatre is hardly the fault of the type if there is no enemy to face in that arena. Your point is another irrelevance.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "You are being pedantic. FACT) The Tornado at Mach 1.1 and the Typhoon at about Mach 1.3 but the Typhoon can only supercruise in a clean configuration ie

The comparison is irrelevant. The Eurofighter was developed by a European consortium to satisfy a requirement for a future European fighter aircraft. There is a subtle clue in the name of the project Euro-fighter. Which part of supercruise involves the use of afterburners? It is also American, not for sale and too expensive which is my point, odd that you can't appreciate that with your desire to make cuts and cost savings.

As for comparisons

More funds to buy more? I think you must have missed the recent SDSR and CSR. Your proposition appears to ignore the reality where the numbers of proposed aircraft have been falling for years now. Can you buy the F22 off the peg? At $150 million a pop they may not represent good value for money for the RAF who already appear fairly committed to the Typhoon after ÂŁbillions spent on development and manufacture, training, integration, spares etc.

Your simplistic suggestion would be laughable if it wasn't so tragic for British tax payer and BAE.

Besides which, the high cost of the F22 aircraft, a lack of clear air-to-air combat missions because of the lengthy delays in the Russian and Chinese fifth generation fighter programs, a US ban on Raptor exports, and the development of the cheaper and more versatile F-35 resulted in calls to end F-22 production. In April 2009 the US Department of Defense proposed to cease placing new orders, subject to Congressional approval, for a final procurement tally of 187 Raptors. The US Senate and House each passed 2010 budget bill versions without F-22 production funding in July 2009. Congress worked to combine these versions into one bill and President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 in October 2009, without funding for F-22 production.

Looks like the Americans want to keep it all to themselves which appears another fly in your ointment.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "I did not say or imply the RAF are unable to fly off the ground period. What I said was "They have enough problems getting the Eurofighter to fly off land let alone a carrier." You may recall we had been discussing the delay and technical problems of the Typhoon which together with insufficent spares meant the Typhoons spent more time on the ground than in the air. The "they" is the manufacturers & Ministry of Defence procurement people and nothing to do with the RAF.'"


Where is your evidence to back this claim up?


Quote: Juan Cornetto "Evidence of more technical problems which are keeping it on the ground

"The grounding order was made on Tuesday. Typhoon aircraft in Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria and Saudi Arabia have been taken out of service" Source

The Tornado cannot operate from a carrier, the Tornado cannot operate from a unprepared landing strips, the Tornado cannot operate without the availability of friendly airstrips away from friendly bases. In that circumstance (such as a Falklands Mk2 conflict) it cannot deliver it's ordanance without a huge logistical support package being launched to get it over target.

Do you disagree with the Harrier pilot who recently said (according to the Telegraph report - linked to previously): "You need three Tornados to do the same work as one Harrier in Afghanistan. Where’s the sense in that?”

Why does the Harrier need to go before it's replacement is on force? Why does the Ark Royal need to go before it's replacement is on force? Why does the Nimrod MRA4 need to be cancelled (having spent most of the money) with no obvious replacement leaving a huge gap in capability and making our coastlines in particular more vulnerable?

These are monetary decisions not military ones and that's why they stink.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2570
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Feb 2024Oct 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Can you two anoraks please continue this debate via PM please!!

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman32466No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2018Aug 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Norman Stanley Fletcher "Can you two anoraks please continue this debate via PM please!!'"


I quite like reading the reposts between one who knows his stuff and the other who is growing increasingly desperate to find more Wikipedia pages on the subject.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2570
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Feb 2024Oct 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: McLaren_Field "I quite like reading the reposts between one who knows his stuff and the other who is growing increasingly desperate to find more Wikipedia pages on the subject.'"

icon_lol.gif

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4934
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2022Dec 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: tvoc "The Typhoon has entered service (despite you claiming it hasn't) in the air to air role. What role was there in either of those conflicts for an air superiority fighter? Not been committed to theatre is hardly the fault of the type if there is no enemy to face in that arena. Your point is another irrelevance. '"


Please be accurate. I have never said it has not entered service. I said it has never been in theatre (of war) It had been announced by the MOD that the Typhoon would be operational in Afganistan in 2007. This never happened because the plane was not fit for purpose at the time despite what PR spin was put on it. The Harriers in Afganistan were replaced by Tornados to much better effect.

Quote: tvoc "The comparison is irrelevant. The Eurofighter was developed by a European consortium to satisfy a requirement for a future European fighter aircraft. There is a subtle clue in the name of the project Euro-fighter. Which part of supercruise involves the use of afterburners? It is also American, not for sale and too expensive which is my point, odd that you can't appreciate that with your desire to make cuts and cost savings.'"


It seems everything is irrelevant to you if it doesn`t meet your viewpoint. The Typhoon programe was started in 1983 with the object of producing a multi-role air superiority fighter. Had it come in on time it would have fullfilled its objectives. However huge time overruns (caused partly by the politicians) and technical troubles have dogged the programme to such an extent that it has fallen behind in the current technology. Planned upgrades may bring it up to speed but at what cost.

Quote: tvoc "As for comparisonsdesigned for different levels of performance. Further, "The Eurofighter is certainly, as far as smoothness of controls and the ability to pull (and sustain high g forces), very impressive", he said. "That is what it was designed to do, especially the version I flew, with the avionics, the color moving map displays, etc. — all absolutely top notch. The maneuverability of the airplane in close-in combat was also very impressive."

More funds to buy more? I think you must have missed the recent SDSR and CSR. Your proposition appears to ignore the reality where the numbers of proposed aircraft have been falling for years now. Can you buy the F22 off the peg? At $150 million a pop they may not represent good value for money for the RAF who already appear fairly committed to the Typhoon after ÂŁbillions spent on development and manufacture, training, integration, spares etc. '"


2004 was a long time ago. The F22 now wins hands down and what about the Russians & Chinese?


Quote: tvoc "Do you disagree with the Harrier pilot who recently said (according to the Telegraph report - linked to previously)

I think you will find that that majority of RAF pilots would disagree with this chap who also said some bitter things about his RAF chiefs because they have retired his plane. The Army, Nato, USA and the RAF are very pleased with the enhanced performance that the Tornado has brought to Afganistan.


Quote: tvoc "Why does the Harrier need to go before it's replacement is on force? Why does the Ark Royal need to go before it's replacement is on force? Why does the Nimrod MRA4 need to be cancelled (having spent most of the money) with no obvious replacement leaving a huge gap in capability and making our coastlines in particular more vulnerable?

These are monetary decisions not military ones and that's why they stink.'"


Because we cannot afford it! Tough decisions have to be made - accept it.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4934
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2022Dec 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Norman Stanley Fletcher "Can you two anoraks please continue this debate via PM please!!'"


Sorry. and you right we should stop as we are never going to agree. We were discussing the cuts and somehow it moved on to the RAF. I don't know enough to be an anorak and have been putting up an argument based on what we can afford and against the last labour Government over borrowing.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4934
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2022Dec 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: McLaren_Field "I quite like reading the reposts between one who knows his stuff and the other who is growing increasingly desperate to find more Wikipedia pages on the subject.'"


Nice of you to support your left wing mate. But thats where tvoc copies his stuff from?

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman32466No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2018Aug 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Left wing ?

You make him sound like Alf Garnetts son-in-law Mike, the scouse git.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach11757No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Apr 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I wonder what will be going through Wilf Rosenberg’s mind if he ever reads this thread?

RankPostsTeam
International Board Member22289
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200322 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Aug 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Juan Cornetto "Please be accurate. I have never said it has not entered service. I said it has never been in theatre (of war) It had been announced by the MOD that the Typhoon would be operational in Afganistan in 2007. This never happened because the plane was not fit for purpose at the time despite what PR spin was put on it. The Harriers in Afganistan were replaced by Tornados to much better effect.'"


Some point in 2008


The cost is irrelevant when there is little or no alternative to continuing. The investment made is too great for it to be shelved now and the alternative you put forward of buying the superior F22 off the peg is impractical even if it was an option ie. even if the US were looking for export customers.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "I think you will find that that majority of RAF pilots would disagree with this chap who also said some bitter things about his RAF chiefs because they have retired his plane. The Army, Nato, USA and the RAF are very pleased with the enhanced performance that the Tornado has brought to Afganistan.'"


I've no idea if that is a trueism and I suspect neither do you. The comment that really interested me though was an operational one, 'You need three Tornados to do the same work as one Harrier in Afghanistan. Where’s the sense in that?”

Would you care to comment?

And that links in with the flexibility offered by a carrier-borne asset being able to operate independant of the need of finding a friendly airstrip nearby. The Black Buck bombing raid on Port Stanley in 1982 (the package required to place a lone Vulcan over the Falklands was out of all proportion to the damage inflicted) although arguably it persuaded the Argentine Junta to hold back it's Mirage 111 jets to defend the mainland. How many prods would it take to get a lone Tornado over the same target if it became neccessary today?

Quote: Juan Cornetto "Because we cannot afford it! Tough decisions have to be made - accept it.'"


I've no problem with tough decisions having to be made as long as they are the correct ones strategically. If Dr Liam Fox has difficulty following the logic of some of the choices being made then why should the British public be any different.

As he concluded in his strategically leaked letter:

'Even at this stage we should be looking at the strategic and security implications of our decisions. It would be a great pity if, having championed the cause of our Armed Forces and set up the innovation of the NSC, we simply produced a cuts package. Cuts there will have to be. Coherence, we cannot do without, if there is to be any chance of a credible narrative.'

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4934
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2022Dec 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: tvoc "The cost is irrelevant when there is little or no alternative to continuing. The investment made is too great for it to be shelved now and the alternative you put forward of buying the superior F22 off the peg is impractical even if it was an option ie. even if the US were looking for export customers. '"


If the upgrades work then we should stick with for now. However the cost is relevant if it becomes higher than buying off the peg. I am sure the USA would sell the F22 to the RAF in the future if we needed it.

Quote: tvoc "I think you will find that that majority of RAF pilots would disagree with this chap who also said some bitter things about his RAF chiefs because they have retired his plane. The Army, Nato, USA and the RAF are very pleased with the enhanced performance that the Tornado has brought to Afganistan.'"


Quote: tvoc "I've no idea if that is a trueism and I suspect neither do you. The comment that really interested me though was an operational one, 'You need three Tornados to do the same work as one Harrier in Afghanistan. Where’s the sense in that?”

Would you care to comment? '"


I already did comment. It is not true. My sources are pilots (but of course only a few) but the RAF/MOD policy and the Governement cuts would also imply that they too would not agree with this angry Harrier pilot who may lose his job.

Quote: tvoc "And that links in with the flexibility offered by a carrier-borne asset being able to operate independant of the need of finding a friendly airstrip nearby. The Black Buck bombing raid on Port Stanley in 1982 (the package required to place a lone Vulcan over the Falklands was out of all proportion to the damage inflicted) although arguably it persuaded the Argentine Junta to hold back it's Mirage 111 jets to defend the mainland. How many prods would it take to get a lone Tornado over the same target if it became neccessary today? '"


This is an interesting one. I too feel it reduces our flexibility. However it would appear the current thinking is that a carrier is quite a big target and as such needs quite an expensive fleet to protect it adequately. There are not too many places where we would not have use of friendly airstrips. As you know Ascension Island was used as a staging and refueling post in the Falklands. Tornados refuel 3 at a time and they train a lot for this purpose and are quite used to popping over the Atlantic to the US for excercises. The two man crew helps on long trips. And we still have the subs!

Quote: tvoc "Because we cannot afford it! Tough decisions have to be made - accept it.'"


Quote: tvoc "I've no problem with tough decisions having to be made as long as they are the correct ones strategically. If Dr Liam Fox has difficulty following the logic of some of the choices being made then why should the British public be any different.

As he concluded in his strategically leaked letter

As Defence Secretary Liam Fox has to stand up for the Military otherwise he would lose all their respect. I don't doubt the views he has expressed are genuine. But he is a right winger and a champion of the the back bench right wing, so he also is taking a political stance against the Centre Coalition thinking. So this political aspect has to be factored in to get a balanced view.

Funny you siding with a right winger! I prefer Wilf Rosenberg

206 posts in 15 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
206 posts in 15 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


3.296875:10
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
1m
Shirt reveal coming soon
Trojan Horse
50
3m
2025 Kit
Marvin Goola
17
9m
Ground Improvements
Trojan Horse
233
Recent
2025 Squad Numbers
Jake the Peg
12
Recent
Realistic targets for 2025
Jake the Peg
143
Recent
Pre Season - 2025
Armavinit
213
Recent
Film game
karetaker
5859
Recent
Matty Ashurst testimonial dinner
Big lads mat
1
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
3m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63297
3m
2025 Recruitment
bowlinboy
228
5m
Pre Season - 2025
Armavinit
213
5m
Super League
FIL
25
5m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
MeanwoodGuy
2630
6m
Transfer Talk V5
Jack Burton
546
6m
Leeds away first up
FIL
51
6m
Castleford sack Lingard
FIL
17
6m
2025 Season tickets
BarnsleyGull
223
8m
Matty Ashurst testimonial dinner
Big lads mat
1
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
2025 Squad Numbers
Jake the Peg
12
TODAY
England Women Las Vegas train-on squad
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Quiz night
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
Co-Captains for 2025
MjM
15
TODAY
Cornwall has a new owner
CM Punk
2
TODAY
Callum Shaw
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Squad Numbers
phe13
4
TODAY
Rhinos squad numbers
Rixy
1
TODAY
Squad numbers
Warrior Wing
8
TODAY
Mat Crowther pre season update
Dunkirk Spir
1
TODAY
Mike Cooper podcast
Wires71
10
TODAY
Shirt reveal coming soon
Trojan Horse
50
TODAY
Opening Championship and League One Fixtures for 2025 Released
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
POSTSONLINEREGISTRATIONSRECORD
19.65M +11,643 ↓-8880,15614,103
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.

When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
RLFANS Match Centre
 Thu 13th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
20:00
Wigan
v
Leigh
 Fri 14th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
20:00
Hull KR
v
Castleford
20:00
Catalans
v
Hull FC
 Sat 15th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
15:00
Leeds
v
Wakefield
17:30
St.Helens
v
Salford
       Championship 2025-R1
18:00
Toulouse
v
Widnes
 Sun 16th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
15:00
Huddersfield
v
Warrington
       Championship 2025-R1
15:00
Bradford
v
LondonB
15:00
Featherstone
v
Doncaster
15:00
Oldham
v
York
15:00
Sheffield
v
Halifax
15:00
Barrow
v
Hunslet
 Thu 20th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
20:00
Wakefield
v
Hull KR
 Fri 21st Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
20:00
Warrington
v
Catalans
20:00
Hull FC
v
Wigan
 Sat 22nd Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
15:00
Salford
v
Leeds
20:00
Castleford
v
St.Helens
 Sun 23rd Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
14:30
Leigh
v
Huddersfield
       League One 2025-R1
15:00
Cornwall
v
Workington
15:00
Dewsbury
v
Crusaders
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds-Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield-Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Fri 28th Feb
SL
20:00
Huddersfield-Hull FC
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Salford
SL
20:00
Leigh-Catalans
Sat 1st Mar
SL
14:30
Wakefield-St.Helens
SL
21:30
Wigan-Warrington
Sun 2nd Mar
SL
15:00
Leeds-Castleford
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
1m
Shirt reveal coming soon
Trojan Horse
50
3m
2025 Kit
Marvin Goola
17
9m
Ground Improvements
Trojan Horse
233
Recent
2025 Squad Numbers
Jake the Peg
12
Recent
Realistic targets for 2025
Jake the Peg
143
Recent
Pre Season - 2025
Armavinit
213
Recent
Film game
karetaker
5859
Recent
Matty Ashurst testimonial dinner
Big lads mat
1
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
3m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63297
3m
2025 Recruitment
bowlinboy
228
5m
Pre Season - 2025
Armavinit
213
5m
Super League
FIL
25
5m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
MeanwoodGuy
2630
6m
Transfer Talk V5
Jack Burton
546
6m
Leeds away first up
FIL
51
6m
Castleford sack Lingard
FIL
17
6m
2025 Season tickets
BarnsleyGull
223
8m
Matty Ashurst testimonial dinner
Big lads mat
1
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
2025 Squad Numbers
Jake the Peg
12
TODAY
England Women Las Vegas train-on squad
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Quiz night
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
Co-Captains for 2025
MjM
15
TODAY
Cornwall has a new owner
CM Punk
2
TODAY
Callum Shaw
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Squad Numbers
phe13
4
TODAY
Rhinos squad numbers
Rixy
1
TODAY
Squad numbers
Warrior Wing
8
TODAY
Mat Crowther pre season update
Dunkirk Spir
1
TODAY
Mike Cooper podcast
Wires71
10
TODAY
Shirt reveal coming soon
Trojan Horse
50
TODAY
Opening Championship and League One Fixtures for 2025 Released
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!