I might if it didnt take an hour to find it

bang on lass!

Like I said before, it was the fact that McGuire's poor performance went on for the full 80 which is the point. No-one else's poor performance leeched into the second half. McGuire just did not come up to standard by any measure whatsoever for the whole match and he really shouldn't be picked for the Kiwi game.

Thats what I said in the pub last night are you sure you wasn't ear wigging

I don't think the problem was with Briscoe, the gaps and busts appeared to be well inside where there was no effective right sided second row defending.

Australia, game in the bag, appeared to opt for a defensive half aided and abetted by the official.

That's because we were playing 4/4/4 - RHS 4 being wing, half, centre and loose and the right second row in the middle four.
There was clear miscommincation between all four on that right hand edge.

So inside to out Sinfield, Smith, McGuire and Briscoe?

How did they reorganise that side in the second half?

You see this is what happens when we make token gestures to clubs in the bottom half of the table.

Strangely, when BRiscoe was taken off the aussies didnt score again..

You are a know nowt fekwit.

All over the place - I lost track of the changes, but we had times with Sinfield in the middle group and times with him on the edge, and that right hand four were constantly changing and I'm not sure how much by design. It's remarkable that side of the defence survived with all the positional changes.
TBH, I think the problems were a couple of individual mistakes, but more so the middle group being pulled over too tight.

I'd imagine Australia's approach after securing the game had a fair bit to do with it rather than any defensive master plan instigated at half time.

Has Eastmond played on the wing for Saints?