yes, I think they made an error. It was intended to sub Kylie on about 30 mins but Bailey got injured so they kept Kylie on and brought Bailey off. IIRC Bailey returned for 1 more stint in the 2nd half but didn't see the game out.

From nothing more than observation (which is clearly more reliable than Sky's stats) I think Bailey spent far less on the field than Kylie and Butterfingers.

I thought Bailey had a pretty decent game on Sunday.

If you looked at him at a scrum or at the start of a set he was trying his best to lift the players when they looked abit flat.

Not at all.
He was saying you run it in lads I`m worried I might get hurt.

Looking at it again, and I know about the Kylie mix up, but I dont think they are wrong with Bailey.

It has Bailey off on 34 minutes, which is correct. Back on on 53 minutes, again correct. Off on 68 minutes, and back on on 78 minutes.

Thats 51 minutes. Burgess definately did not spend that time on the field.

They ARE wrong with Bailey. He was subbed inside 30 mins.

He went off after a bang on his nut IIRC.
That was about 20 minutes in i'm sure of it.

I thought he was subbed with JJB coming back on for him. JJB only been off less than 10 minutes.

You're absolutely right.

He coulda had class. He coulda been a contender. He could’ve been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what He is.

I'm sure you were first on scene to kiss it better!!

Leeds need a big game from Bailey this week.

We do.

His form suggests that that is a safe bet.

Look at the Wire game when we lost JP early doors, TMFMISL had a huge game.

I think he thrives on the extra responsibilty. He will need to lead the pack again and I have every confidence in his ability to do this and his all round contribution and execution will help steer the team through vital nitty-gritty that is needed to assist winning a game.

where did my post go?

It didn't make any sense so I deleted it.

So that's what happened to Damo.