Agar has surprised me & a lot of people but I think last night showed a difference in the quality of coaching. The gap in ability wasn't as large as the score.

Yes, but that wasn't Saints full team remember. They had a lot of fringe players in. That said, it also as the oppossite effect, in that players were trying to earn a shirt for a cup final, which is always dangerous.

That's what I mean. The difference in the quality of players on the pitch wasn't that large. If their first 17 had been out there it would have been. The quality of Saints play is very impressive. A number of their players were average under fatty Cunningham.

It would appear lots of changes to come but players coming in must be better than what weve got ability and attitude

I think based on the last 6 or so matches we are probably just about a top 5 team. There's a big gap between that and where saints are at the moment.

Would agree with this.

It looked like we were stretching to match Saints’ speed and power all game, and we ran out of gas a few times.

The second phase plan was OK but we don’t have quite the skill to execute.

We clearly need more structure. When the players are busted they need a shape to revert to; at the moment we’re just winging it or giving it to the big lad. Saints attack more like an NRL side; as a whole team with bodies in motion and plenty of live options to take.

We are trying to make the miracle individually too often.

Someone needs to get hold of Walker and really sort out his passing options joining the line - more often than not he is missing the target and/or slinging it into touch.

Given that we accept the squad is still going to be in transition next season, it makes sense for Agar to hold the reins for another season. The alternative is risking another Furner-style nose-dive to the bottom if the players don't respond to a new coach, which is detrimental to ongoing development - especially if relegation is retained for next season.

So, Agar to do a 'Powell' (pre-2004 version) for a season or two, while the under-performers are thrown out and younger players brought in, and at the right time bring in a 'Smith' (2004 vintage) to take the revitalised team to challenge for titles. The Agar team should be able to compete in the top half of the table, probably top 5. This is all contingent upon Agar pulling us clear of relegation and the team continuing to perform in most games in the rest of the season.

It's not ideal but I think we have learned this season there are no quick fixes, and we have to be patient.

If a top cannot put in place it makes sense to stick with Agar.

That may be the case. We're hardly an attractive option right now having fired Furner and any new coach faces at least a year of more rebuilding.

It will be interesting to see how Holbrook goes at the Titans. They're an utter shambles.

He's not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy

I think it has to be it's always a risk bringing a new coach. There's too much surgery needed with this team for a unproven coach to have a chance of success.The senior players seem to rate Agar so as I've stated earlier unless someone of proven ability can be rought in I would stick with Agar.Wo would you like Brisbane?

Agar has done a decent job imo and unless we have our 1st choice signed up ( whoever that may be) I wouldn't be too disappointed if he did another season. On the whole he has brought the team together and got them playing for each other in a way that we have not seen since McDermott left. We looked a shambles under Lowes/Sinfield and Furner and despite a few poor performances I don't see that under Agar.