Indeed. I have often thought that the shape of Stevo's head is slightly reminiscent of an , so the theory stands so far.

Surely the leeway is because we are now used to this position. We experienced it last year, we knee jerked, and Smith delivered in the end. Perhaps out of this experience we just expect the same again.

Also though which cant be swept under the carpet. The very team that Smith won the GF with has only been available to Bluey, on one occassion this year. The rest of the time players have been missing left, right, and , through injuries. This is not something that Smith had to endure throughout his time here.

he shouldn't. Why should Smith have?

Cos he didn't have a "rugby brain", I've told you............

Because Smith was judged on more than just Rugby League and because Smith made mistakes which he refused to publically accept.

His failure in 2005 was down to ineptitue, in fact his tenure in charge of the Rhinos was an up and down affair, culminating in the final up in the GF last season.

As far as Bluey in concerned this proof will be in the big games starting with the Dragons in France followed by the Saints.

Why more leeway for Bluey? It is all about history and context really.

Under Smith we had seen the GF winning team of 2004 falter in 2005 and undergo a marked decline in 2006. In 2007 the bad moments (like losing to HKR away - after which I confess to calling for Smith's sacking) felt like it was going to be 2006 all over again, and that 2004 was not being capitalised on.

However, 'Bluey' has started the season very well, and despite the recent run of bad form, we're still very much in uncharted waters with him as coach. As he lacks a history with Leeds (or any other SL club), I think it is more a case of wait and see before I become more critical. I think much depends on how this form drop is handled - if we continue to decline until the end of the season and coaching decisions play a role in this it will be open season on McClennan on this board.

I think the fact he lacks any League experience may be the biggest concern I have, coaching the New Zealand side to success very much depends on whether the players like you or not - the fact that Bluey is very much a people skilled coach would dictate that they enjoyed playing for him.

The interesting thing with any people orientated leaders is whether they can have those difficult conversations - in my experience they very rearely have this sklll.

Why should he? What confidence would it instill in his players if he were the type of leader who meekly apologised to the masses every time he made a decision which they perceived as a mistake.

2005 a failure? Ineptitude? Well, he won the WCC and reached both finals so let's see whether Bluey because an inept failure himself.

'"

Last year games in the 'slump' were lost against sides we expected to beat or lost when they looked to be won.

This year we are winning games from being behind or coming back to nearly win.

If the kick had gone over on Friday it would have been as rose tinted as the Murray era comeback @ Sheffield.

Whilst losing there is a sense of adversity & entertainment this year & yes it go like 2005 with just one trophy @ the beginning or like 2007 with a champions crown @ the end.

At least it's not like 2006

'"

what's an ''an booty''?

I like that comment.

I like that comment.
Thats not enough to make a definitive decision on the bloke, its a general observation, and certainly not one to convince me either way.


I'll make my final decision on what he delivers on the pitch if thats ok with you?

That's fine by me. I'd actively encourage it. Just as I did with our greatest ever coach at a similar stage last year.

I am encouraged so many of you fekkwitts appear to have learned your lesson.

Its like an "other word beginning with the letter a but not popular with the swear filter."

You didn't need the word "an" in your question twice, by the way. Since we're being picky.