FORUMS FORUMS



  
FORUMS > Leeds Rhinos > WELL DONE LEEDS
146 posts in 11 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4934
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2022Dec 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: tvoc "If Cross intended to fend using an horizontal forearm then I guess it must have been deliberate first, poor technique second and perhaps clumsy third. '"


By using an argument based on your "Ifs" and "guesses" you can read into it what you will in order to make a case. But that doesn't make you right.

The fact is in the Tomkins case he was sent off because in the ref's opinion the arm was deliberately raised into the face after contact to cause injury and who will doubt it knowing Tomkins involvement in the preceding brawl and this players violent history.

While in Cross's case he was not sent off (was he even put on report by the ref?) as the ref did not think anything was deliberate and neither did the Castleford players. A penalty yes but further action no.

Quote: tvoc "The incidents (viewed in isolation) were similar enough in that they both involved the ball carrier using a raised horizontal forearm as a fend/bumper. Both connected at chest level, both ended up above the shoulder. '"
But you seem not to want to recognise that one was deemed to be deliberate while the other was accidental. A big difference.

Quote: tvoc "No doubt although the two match ban was specifically for the fend with the forearm and not the preceeding incident. Ganson reported it as an elbow IIRC (arguably invented to justify a red card) and something the disciplinary panel dismissed .

The panel appear pre-disposed to support (rather than undermine) the officials when they have taken the ultimate in game sanction.'"


I think that the panel, quite correctly, took into consideration the preceding events and Tomkins part in the brawl and judged that he was deliberately violent. The histerical Eddie & Stevo also incorrectly reported the Cross incident as using the elbow.

Many players are penalised and suspended for contact with the forearm including Ablett this season and Lauitiiti a couple of years ago on Westwood. Morley was regularly in trouble for it and Bailey was up before the beak on the same charge. In many cases where it is the ball carrying arm that makes contact it is not deliberate as is often the tackler that makes contact with the ball carrying arm before it can be withdrawn.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach11658
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2018Aug 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Juan Cornetto "
While in Cross's case he was not sent off (was he even put on report by the ref?) as the ref did not think anything was deliberate and neither did the Castleford players.'"


Just to be a pedant but players don't get put on report, incidents in the game do. icon_wink.gif

RankPostsTeam
Moderator9208
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200618 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED

Moderator


Surley the last few pages should be transferred to TMFMISL thread?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4934
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2022Dec 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: thebloodbath "Where has Cross brought the biff? I just see silly penalties.'"


So far he has made fewer silly penalities than Bailey per game! A contact sport like RL will occassionally have a bit of biff and I am sure should the occassion arise Cross will not take a step backwards and certainly will not hide behind his scrumhalf like Bailey shamefully did.

Quote: thebloodbath "By 'niggled' I suppose you mean chicken winged? That's ok then.'"


No I mean he was bested by Crabtree & co and didn't like it.

Quote: thebloodbath "He did w[sizeh[/sizeallop Brown, that I have no problem with, he was milking like the immoral little letch he is so TMFMISL gave him something to go down about. Then followed it up and smashed the biggest disgrace in NRL history, where's the issue?'"


You appear to like foul and violent play. I don't. To "wallop" a half back does not make Bailey a man to be feared but rather despised. "Smashed" !!!!

Quote: thebloodbath "As for the points scored and when, Bailey's antics didn't allow the score board to blow-out or cost us the game. So it didn't have a negative impact on us. If anything it brought us to life and put some fire in the other forwards' otherwise flat bellies. And like you get taught early on if you get sent off make sure you're not walking alone. But he was got at and the card reds were fair enough, Brown should have gone though as well.'"


You still avoid the fact before Bailey disgraced himself he had "marshalled" our defence to be 20-0 down. Nice technique!

Quote: thebloodbath "The team that's selected is fine with me. All the coaches from Powell to Mac play TMFMISL, show me a trophy win where you don't see the 1000KW grin from Mr Bailey. History matters, but he earns his selcetion on form and the hand pickings of the 5 games you have mentioned (followed up by Mac waxing lyrical) show that he is there on merit and we are a stronger unit with his services. Simples.

Ride on cowboy.'"


Bailey has very limited skills - in fact he is basically just a tackler. They used to say tacklers are 2 a penny and you could go down to Buz Vale and sign up several good tacklers any weekend.

All the coaches play the squad that they have. Bailey has been a low cost fringe player that has been lucky to have been around to enjoy the trophy success that creative players like Sinfield, Maguire and Burrow have achieved. Note Big Mac has also waxed lyrical regarding Hauraki!

Hi Ho Silver!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach19234No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Feb 2016Feb 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



JC and BB the "When Harry met Sally" of SS.com icon_heartkiss.gif

RankPostsTeam
International Board Member22289
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200322 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Aug 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Juan Cornetto "By using an argument based on your "Ifs" and "guesses" you can read into it what you will in order to make a case. But that doesn't make you right.'"


Or neccessarily wrong? Unlike some I don't presume to know what others think.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "The fact is in the Tomkins case he was sent off because in the ref's opinion the arm was deliberately raised into the face after contact to cause injury and who will doubt it knowing Tomkins involvement in the preceding brawl and this players violent history. '"


The refs opinion was that an elbow was used - the disciplinary panel dismissed there had been any use of an elbow.

Tomkins violent history? He's a rugby league forward, not Ghandi.

The disciplinary panel on the Tomkins send off opened the case by stating In the Panel’s opinion you struck a Hull FC player (Yeaman) in the face with your forearm whilst in possession of the ball. The Panel believed that you had raised your forearm at the defender as he made the tackle, contact was made with the face of your opponent, this contact was reckless, and that it had the potential to cause your opponent injury. The Panel believed that in raising your forearm as you did; you ought to have been aware of an obvious risk of the forearm making contact with the head, but nonetheless raised the forearm where a reasonable person would not do so. In accordance with the RFL’s On Field Sentencing Guidelines, the Panel consider that such offence is a Grade B offence (Strikes with hand, arm or shoulder – forearm in possession of the ball - reckless). [/i

I am wondering which part of that description could not equally have been applied to the Ben Cross incident at Castleford?

Quote: Juan Cornetto "While in Cross's case he was not sent off (was he even put on report by the ref?) as the ref did not think anything was deliberate and neither did the Castleford players. A penalty yes but further action no.'"


Why would a referee need to place an incident on report that they had seen clearly for themselves and dealt with. The 'on report' system is surely only there for incidents they are unsighted or unsure about. In any case the referee doesn't need to put any incident on report these days as all games are scrutinised in full by the video review panel who in this case referred it on to the full disciplinary panel. How do you know the Castleford player's didn't think it was deliberate? They were receiving an unexpected penalty while not in possession and quite rightly allowing the referee to deal with the occurrence of foul play.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "But you seem not to want to recognise that one was deemed to be deliberate while the other was accidental. A big difference.'"


Deemed by who? The referee who saw the use of an elbow (not seen by the disciplinary panel) or the referee who saw a bump that ended in an opposition player's face. I saw both incidents the same .... perhaps because they basically were the same. A raised horizontal forearm used as a fend, that contacted a defender in the chest and raised up into the neck/head area.

As a ball carrier you either raise a horizontal forearm or you don't. If you do it's almost always (if not always) a deliberately action to try and bump defenders away. If it's raised and used horizontally it's also liable to continue to raise up after the initial bump/contact as it did in both these comparable instances.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "I think that the panel, quite correctly, took into consideration the preceding events and Tomkins part in the brawl and judged that he was deliberately violent. '"


The panel dealt with the two incidents seperately. Tomkins was not the aggressor in the first incident and was acting in self-defence after being pushed twice and punched before (understandably?) retaliating. Unfortunately I haven't seen any footage of this and so I am relying on the Disciplinary Panel's report into the incident.

Quote: Juan Cornetto "Many players are penalised and suspended for contact with the forearm including Ablett this season and Lauitiiti a couple of years ago on Westwood. Morley was regularly in trouble for it and Bailey was up before the beak on the same charge.'"


When has Ablett been suspended this season for use of a forearm?

Quote: Juan Cornetto "In many cases where it is the ball carrying arm that makes contact it is not deliberate as is often the tackler that makes contact with the ball carrying arm before it can be withdrawn.'"


What has this got to do with the Cross incident?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach9730No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2017Mar 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Juan Cornetto "A contact sport like RL will occassionally have a bit of biff and I am sure should the occassion arise Cross will not take a step backwards and certainly will not hide behind his scrumhalf like Bailey shamefully did.
'"


Ok Tonto we'll leave that in the 'Wait and See' file, good one.

This point seems to counter-argue this following sentence,

"You appear to like foul and violent play. I don't."

If Mr Bailey gets involved lets take the moral high-ground, but if Cross in theory gets involved it's all casual 'wont take a backward step' and thats alright.

Talk about non-subtle agendas. That one was painful.

0/10 on that one Old Boy, must try harder.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach9730No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2017Mar 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Juan Cornetto "
All the coaches play the squad that they have. Bailey has been a low cost fringe player that has been lucky to have been around to enjoy the trophy success that creative players like Sinfield, Maguire and Burrow have achieved. '"


How do you know the earnings of Mr Bailey?

I like peoples assuming of salaries. It really under-pins and highlights the utter tosh they come out with. Because if they state the un-known as fact, how can we take other 'opinions' seriously.

I questioned Tonto's rugby acumen and it looks as if I was correct to do so. And please do not be as condesending to write-off Baileys medals as 'lucky' to be around, like he is a passenger. He makes his contribution, like the rest of the team in recent years in the line of silverwear. Yes the above mentioned players are very creative, and they are allowed to be especially when the pack (including TMFMISL) get on top.

You have sinken deeper and have now left edgy points to one side and are just spraying verbal horse. This does you no favours.

Your rugby acumen allegation has been answered. Thanks.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4934
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2022Dec 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: tvoc "
Tomkins violent history? He's a rugby league forward, not Ghandi.'"


We agree Tomkins is not Ghandi - but but he has earned a reputation for violence.


Quote: tvoc "The disciplinary panel on the Tomkins send off opened the case by stating In the Panel’s opinion you struck a Hull FC player (Yeaman) in the face with your forearm whilst in possession of the ball. The Panel believed that you had raised your forearm at the defender as he made the tackle, contact was made with the face of your opponent, this contact was reckless, and that it had the potential to cause your opponent injury. The Panel believed that in raising your forearm as you did; you ought to have been aware of an obvious risk of the forearm making contact with the head, but nonetheless raised the forearm where a reasonable person would not do so. In accordance with the RFL’s On Field Sentencing Guidelines, the Panel consider that such offence is a Grade B offence (Strikes with hand, arm or shoulder – forearm in possession of the ball - reckless). [/i

I am wondering which part of that description could not equally have been applied to the Ben Cross incident at Castleford?'"


The part highlighted above in red was the judgement of the panel having reviewed the evidence - Note

Because they did not react against Cross which normall6y happens when players think they have been deliberatly fouled eg the Tomkins case.


Quote: tvoc "When has Ablett been suspended this season for use of a forearm?'"

Sorry I meant last season funnily enough against a Tomkins!

Quote: tvoc "What has this got to do with the Cross incident?'"


Just pointing out example that most forwards fall foul of use of the forearm at some stage. But there is a difference between reckless with intent and just clumsy.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4934
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2022Dec 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: thebloodbath "Ok Tonto we'll leave that in the 'Wait and See' file, good one.'"


My point was he didn't back down against Josh Perry and he didn't throw the first punch but he didn't take a backward step either.

Quote: thebloodbath "This point seems to counter-argue this following sentence,

"You appear to like foul and violent play. I don't."

If Mr Bailey gets involved lets take the moral high-ground, but if Cross in theory gets involved it's all casual 'wont take a backward step' and thats alright.

Talk about non-subtle agendas. That one was painful.

0/10 on that one Old Boy, must try harder.'"


I do not like deliberate foul or ly play. Its negative and shows a lack of skill. Neither am I justifying it if it had been Cross. However if the opposition start something I will not be critical of our players defending one another or themselves. EG if a prop forward hits a half back then its fair do's to go to the assistance of the half back.

Bailey is often the perpetrator of trouble as the whole of Superleague knows which is why he is so disliked and also why Tomkins is so disliked.

So do keep up at the back BB and 0/10 to you young man.

RankPostsTeam
Club Owner18299
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200321 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Oct 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED

Moderator


Good thread this.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4934
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2022Dec 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: thebloodbath "How do you know the earnings of Mr Bailey?

I like peoples assuming of salaries. It really under-pins and highlights the utter tosh they come out with. Because if they state the un-known as fact, how can we take other 'opinions' seriously.'"


Quite. But if you think Bailey is one of the higher paid established players then your opinion is as flaky as a Donald Trump haircut!

Quote: thebloodbath "I questioned Tonto's rugby acumen and it looks as if I was correct to do so. And please do not be as condesending to write-off Baileys medals as 'lucky' to be around, like he is a passenger. He makes his contribution, like the rest of the team in recent years in the line of silverwear. Yes the above mentioned players are very creative, and they are allowed to be especially when the pack (including TMFMISL) get on top.'"


I have consistently acknowleged Baileys usefullness as a benchman over the years and I also have posted when Bailey has been outstanding. Because these occassions are not that frequent is testament to his position as no more than a useful squad member of the years. In fact I will go as far as to say a very useful squad member over the years.

However lets not get carried away. To put his skills in perspective just look at any of the GF winning teams that Bailey has been part of and rank each player in order of importance.

Quote: thebloodbath "You have sinken deeper and have now left edgy points to one side and are just spraying verbal horse. This does you no favours.

Your rugby acumen allegation has been answered. Thanks.'"


Hit a raw nerve eh.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach9730No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2017Mar 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Juan Cornetto "My point was he didn't back down against Josh Perry and he didn't throw the first punch but he didn't take a backward step either.
'"


Translates in reality to Perry owned Cross.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach9730No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2017Mar 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Juan Cornetto "Quite. But if you think Bailey is one of the higher paid established players then your opinion is as flaky as a Donald Trump haircut!
'"


I don't deal with assumptions or finger in the air stuff. I'll leave that to you.

I prefer analytical acumen.

No need to bring Top Trumps scalp into matters. icon_wink.gif

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach9730No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2017Mar 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Juan Cornetto "I have consistently acknowleged Baileys usefullness as a benchman over the years and I also have posted when Bailey has been outstanding. Because these occassions are not that frequent is testament to his position as no more than a useful squad member of the years. In fact I will go as far as to say a very useful squad member over the years.'"


Thanks for the apology.

I accept.

146 posts in 11 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
146 posts in 11 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


6.31005859375:10
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
35m
Transfer Talk V5
Once were Lo
518
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
10s
2025 Recruitment
Pyrah123
212
16s
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
NickyKiss
9
20s
Getting a new side to gel
Wigan Bull
2
24s
2025 Fixtures
Jemmo
1
30s
Shopping list for 2025
HU8HFC
5588
33s
Transfer Talk V5
Once were Lo
518
34s
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
43s
Film game
karetaker
5766
1m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Theeaststand
4048
1m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
tad rhino
2611
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Shirt reveal coming soon
Khlav Kalash
2
TODAY
Opening Championship and League One Fixtures for 2025 Released
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Getting a new side to gel
Wigan Bull
2
TODAY
Fixtures
Hockley Bron
12
TODAY
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
2025 Fixtures
Jemmo
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
POSTSONLINEREGISTRATIONSRECORD
19.65M 1,162 80,15614,103
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.

When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
RLFANS Match Centre
 Thu 13th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
20:00
Wigan
v
Leigh
 Fri 14th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
20:00
Hull KR
v
Castleford
20:00
Catalans
v
Hull FC
 Sat 15th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
15:00
Leeds
v
Wakefield
17:30
St.Helens
v
Salford
       Championship 2025-R1
18:00
Toulouse
v
Widnes
 Sun 16th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
15:00
Huddersfield
v
Warrington
       Championship 2025-R1
15:00
Bradford
v
LondonB
15:00
Featherstone
v
Doncaster
15:00
Oldham
v
York
15:00
Sheffield
v
Halifax
15:00
Barrow
v
Hunslet
 Thu 20th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
20:00
Wakefield
v
Hull KR
 Fri 21st Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
20:00
Warrington
v
Catalans
20:00
Hull FC
v
Wigan
 Sat 22nd Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
15:00
Salford
v
Leeds
20:00
Castleford
v
St.Helens
 Sun 23rd Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
14:30
Leigh
v
Huddersfield
       League One 2025-R1
15:00
Cornwall
v
Workington
15:00
Dewsbury
v
Crusaders
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds-Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield-Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
SL
20:00
St.Helens-Hull KR
Sat 8th Mar
SL
17:30
Catalans-Leeds
Sun 9th Mar
SL
17:30
Warrington-Wakefield
SL
17:30
Wigan-Huddersfield
Thu 20th Mar
SL
20:00
Salford-Huddersfield
Fri 21st Mar
SL
20:00
St.Helens-Warrington
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
35m
Transfer Talk V5
Once were Lo
518
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
10s
2025 Recruitment
Pyrah123
212
16s
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
NickyKiss
9
20s
Getting a new side to gel
Wigan Bull
2
24s
2025 Fixtures
Jemmo
1
30s
Shopping list for 2025
HU8HFC
5588
33s
Transfer Talk V5
Once were Lo
518
34s
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
43s
Film game
karetaker
5766
1m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Theeaststand
4048
1m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
tad rhino
2611
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Shirt reveal coming soon
Khlav Kalash
2
TODAY
Opening Championship and League One Fixtures for 2025 Released
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Getting a new side to gel
Wigan Bull
2
TODAY
Fixtures
Hockley Bron
12
TODAY
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
2025 Fixtures
Jemmo
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!