Bleedin ell Gotcha what did the kid do wrong ? his defence was pretty solid and he didn't get a decent pass all day.
Ok he spilled the ball a couple of times in the tackle playing in monsoon conditions on a bog of a pitch which btw most of our team did.
For me our worst performers were Burrow ,Kirke and Achurch ball in hand and defensively whilst we conceded 2 tries i thought all of them had a dig.

Would love to see Josh get a go against Salford but can't see it.

Jimmy was awful on the wing? He had no opportunities in attack and had no kicks to deal with in defence. So how can anyone make a judgement.

Think he made one unforced error which is understandable in the weather, the rest were from shocking passes.

Exactly, don't know how anyone can call his performance "awful"

Sunley was called back from Hunslet because the coaching staff didn't think he was ready for the week to week intensity of Championship rugby, so not very likely to get called up I wouldn't think.

Seems like an opportunity to me for playing Chisholm on the wing with Keinhorst his centre (or FB with Watkins remaining at centre)

When's Vickery back? And why not try Chisholm on the wing?

He never went in the first place, it was printed in error and im guessing the statement on their website was to cover this error.

anyone who is carrying a niggle should be wrapped up in cotton wool now ready for next week.

we have had 2 solid hit outs and should be able to rest a few against a depleted Salford at home.

Come on rhinoms, firstly he is not a kid, and secondly what did he do well?

Let's also drop this bog of a ptich thing, because it didn't bother the oppossition.

In order to take a jersey in this team you need to play well when the opportunity arises, and contribute something. Not "not a lot wrong". That was the point I was making, and further stated that I was talking about him in the wing position.

9 carries and 3 dropped balls, along with the missed tackle, the poor positioning for kicks, and the lost at sea stance demonstrated. A game that needed players to pull their sleeves up and work hard, and he wasn't there for it. Vickery made as much contribution last week in 20 minutes. I would have said Vickery's permonce last week was "not a lot wrong" considering it was only 20 minutes, so I can't see how this week could be compared.

I find it strange aswell that you picked out 3 players as "worst performers" and yet their contribution exceeded what Keinhorst gave us. I agree their performances were not good, although I would definitely argue that Kirke really gave us good needed yardage when asked to.

Compare all the wingers performance from that game Sunday, then you will see what I was saying. It wasn't a write off of him, I just questioned that we must have better options at winger.

He missed 1 tackle, made 3 errors and only managed 4 metres per carry (38m for 9 carries)

In those conditions he was no worse than most and as for the other 3 offering more i disagree.
Far too many times Burrow tried to play "summer RL" and ran up his own @ss or passed "shockingly" to someones feet or in Kirkes case someone who wasn't even looking.
Achurch might aswell have worn a blind fold when offloading far too many were forced and thrown down towards the players bootlaces and you rip into Keinhorst.
As for him not being a kid in SL experience terms he's very raw and young i'm not sayig he was brilliant but to just single him out when much more experienced players were worse or made just as many errors doesnt add up.
Also just to clear up i'm not knocking anyones "effort" because i thought we worked hard but a lot of our execusion and descision making was p!$$ imo.

I am not single him out. There were worse performers. I have been clear on that. I was questioning him playing on the wing, where I think he looks completely lost. Which is why I said surely we have better options for the wing.

In all honesty I think you could split the players performances on Sunday in to two camps, gave it go as expected and just awful. A lot were in the just awful camp, regarless of looking for excuses with the conditions.

It's very very rare I say anything negative on Sinfield, but he was just awful on Sunday, and yes he was joined by Burrow. Interestingly, I would have put McShane in the gave it a go higher performance, but it was the switching of Burrow at that point that really made Burrow performance drop.

Watson is fit again now but it is unlikely that BMac will drop Zac for Salford. How can you tell Zac is groggy? He always speaks like that!!!
I would have thought it best to drop Zac for Salford and save him for the biggey. Watson could come in at FB and that is definately a better option than Hall. Watson needs some game time to build his confidence, then we can start to see the brilliance he used to show in the 20s

Burrow looked average as a half? Where have I heard that before?

Signed Harrigan, 2000 and whatever to when he got shifted to dummy half.