senior told sky sport he has three offers on the table for 2012 i know were one of them (pay as you play) but do we know who the other two are ? www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/ ... ng-options

senior told sky sport he has three offers on the table for 2012 i know were one of them (pay as you play) but do we know who the other two are ? www1.skysports.com/rugby-league/ ... ng-options

The pay as you play has been rejected mate so i doubt we are one of the 3 involved.

Hull KR for sure www.thisishullandeastriding.co.u ... story.html

Hull KR for sure www.thisishullandeastriding.co.u ... story.html

A truly sad indictment of SL and its development of youngsters - a crocked player in his mid 30s who was well passed his best before his injury has clubs still wanting to sign him!!

In my opinion Senior is still a better option than either (or both) of the first choice centres at at least 8 of the current clubs.

What that says about Super League is up to you to decide.

Someone has to replace the jorneymen antipodeans - why not Senior?

Dont forget we were willing to keep paying him - albeit pay as you play. If the SL Champs are willing to have him in the fold is it that big a surprise some of the rest are interested?

For a lower level SL club a fit Senior would represent a good marketing tool and a bit of quality compared to what they prob have.

When you talk about an old man taking a youngsters place I suspect your talking about players like Hardaker and Watkins. Many lower level clubs dont have this quality of youngster at their club.

Senior can still do a job for some.

if its pay as you play i cant see why any s.l club wouldnt want him he brings a professional attitude and bags of experience obviously still keen and theres alot worse out there with full time contracts

is he being sought after as a centre or a second row? the fact he can play both still to a high standard will appeal to some clubs

I would say he's unproven in one role, and whether he's he's still quality depends on what your definition of quality is

Some on here have very short memories indeed, Senior has given great service to our club and until injury was first choice centre. Apparently he has still not recovered from injury and not in full training yet, so talk of who he might play for is very premature.
My opinion, he may still have a little to give and would be a first rate back up/squad member still. Hardaker and Watkins have plenty of potential, but are we getting a little carried away with the expectations to quickly, because at this stage of their development thats all it is potential/possibility.

Here here

Some have very jaundiced view - Senior was very poor - albeit in a poor side at the time. His best days were several years behind him. The injury he suffered is amongst the most serious for any player never mind a player at 35?

The point is, we should as a sport be able to develop younger players of the appropriate quality so that we no longer require very aged players. We will never challenge the Aussies if we are unable to develop an appropriate player pool.

Finally not sure I would want a player in my squad who is solely focused on achieving his own goal of 600 games.

the time was right to let him go. he should go down as a legend but all legends have to go sometime.

I know the feeling tad oh wait you said legend not leg end