Read it rlhererl...

Bang on the button again David, there was so many good performances its hard to give a man of the match but agree Bailey, Buderus and Ablett real class

Was talking to someone who was in the br after the game, apparently Kirke got McLennan's MOM - he said he played 3 positions in 35 minutes.

what does McLennan know?

Kirke is a good solid player. I haven't seen any criticism of him on here. Always seems to step up in the big games as well.

I Have

Just in case you're being serious for a moment (which is far from certain)

Delaney mark spot on

some ace work on King

Am I the only one who thought Leuluai was MOM?

I thought he was second, only beaten by Ablett. I find David's comments bewildering. Although to be fair he did miss a couple of tackles going for the big hits. But his influence on that match was far greater than some other players.

Bailey and Kylie were both brilliant.

I would have given them both a 9.

Awesome effort from Bailey to fill into Peacock's shoes early doors.

Ran the ball in hard, tackled everything that moved. By the end of the first half he was literally out on his feet.

I thought the forwards were fantastic considering losing Peacock, No Ali or Burgess, a half fit Eastwood and young Clarkson against a very good Wire pack.

Friday showed that Buderus & Diskin can work, also leaves the coach with a few decisions regarding 6,7,13

McGuire - Sinfield - Ablett looks very good to me but Burrow is too good to be left out

I'm a Bailey fan and I thought he was great on friday but the one thing he does not do is run the ball in hard.

Pretty disingenuous to dig up a quote that had nothing to do with Friday's match.

As for David's ratings, spot on aside from too high a mark for Eastwood and too effusive in his praise for Kirke.

Of course, he wouldn't be the first to do it would he.



So it wasn't spot on? 3.55322265625:5