rlhttp://www.loverugbyleague.com/news_9547-leeds-to-use-twitter-names-on-shirts.htmlrl

Dear me

I heard and i cringed. Embarrassing

Me too. And whenever we do these type of publicity things we end up with egg on our face. Can we not just stick to rugby.

Yup. I'm sure the different lettering on the shirts will have a huge effect on how the game goes.

These exclamations weren't being made when I think it was Wigan (Millard era IIRC) when they all grew tashes.

Makes no odds to me. I have no inclination to stalk people or inviting them to stalk me.

Yeah, me either!!!

Btw, it's @HollywoodHarrigan ... Follow me

Are you a scientologist as well.

Must follow, must follow, must follow.

The Super League product cannot sell itself by just sticking to the rugby, otherwise more and more fans would see the it for what it really is - a substandard competition comprised of 27 meaningless rounds of low-intensity fixtures with little to no skill on show. That's why the product needs sideshows like a band in the south stand to drum up an atmosphere and twitter shirts to help promote the brand to the t majority.

I think they should go a step further with those shirts so the players could then wear them with their latest tweets. For instance, McGuire's shirt could tweet that Friday's game isn't that important, that he's not bothered about the result or the performance because Leeds will win when it really counts later on. Peacock's shirt could tweet about his current rage and Bailey could tweet his latest joke, etc.

What's with the 'new' user account?

Did you get banned again?

It worked pretty well for Real Valencia and the NBA. Don't be afraid of change!

@GavWilson

Keith was banned several weeks ago. Reason given? Thread drift.

So if someone had been on twitter a bit ago, and he was chatting to his mate would he put it in the past tense ie:
"I was tering a bit ago...."

PS @PhilClarkeSkyS - - - I've been giving him some right jip and he's been biting like fook!! Hahaha, I encourage all to do the same...