FORUMS > Leeds Rhinos > Making the punishment fit the crime |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5526 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2018 | Jan 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
1 Warrington 2 Hull 3 Wigan 4 Castleford 4 Castleford 5 St Helens 6 Leeds 7 Catalans 8 Hudedersfield 9 Widnes 10 Wakefield
11 Salford 12 Leigh
Playoffs:Warrington Hull Wigan Castleford
Four sides rejoining: Widnes Wakefield Salford Leigh
GF Winners Warrington CC Winners Wigan: |
|
| Following on from McGuire's one match ban which is likely to be served by him missing the Boxing Day friendly, we are now likely to see Westwood serving his possible 2-match ban by sitting out the England friendly vs Italy & England's opening World cup match.
In neither instance does it seem to me that justice has been meted out.
Neither club side for whom the miscreant was playing has been penalised in a meaningful manner.
I'm sure that this has been debated before but should the penalty not be imposed by making the guilty players miss his club's first team cup, league or play-off matches?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Administrator | 8538 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
744.jpg :744.jpg |
Administrator
|
| It should count in the competition where the suspension was incurred, otherwise it is a joke.
But even better, and here is a novel idea, why not punish it in the game where the offence took place. It does require referees to have a bit of backbone. Radical I know, but it might just catch on.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 11658 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2018 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
35138.jpg Fat people are harder to kidnap.:35138.jpg |
|
| Being able to serve a ban in friendlies is simply farcical.
I seem to remember a Hull player managed to serve a two match ban during the Floodlit 9's.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 4239 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2013 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
实事求是!: |
|
| It's a farce. More incidents need to be dealt with on field, report is a safety net. The sin bin should be utilised alot more for this type of foul play. As it is even the sin bin seems rare and only seems to be used when theres been too much lying on. Utilising the sinbin you penalise the defender and the team there and then and you don't destroy the game.
But failing all that, at least when you're going through the disciplinary procedure, apply some common f*cking sense.
Bans for friendlies, being utilised in a seperate competition to where the incident occured.....what clueless monkey dreamt this up? Who's in charge of this?
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 12106 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2015 | Oct 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
10393.jpg OBN Wannabe:10393.jpg |
|
| "On report" is a meaningless sop to baying fans which gives the referee a way of making no decision while appearing to do something. Any incident can be reviewed by the judiciary, so the whole thing is a sham. This is not news.
Serving bans in friendlies is silly. Competitive internationals should count though. Losing out on a cap, and more if your replacement does well, is punishment for the individual.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4994 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
27794.gif [b:1zy5cey6]"...To those people that wrote this team off...
to all those that criticised this team...
tonight's for you"
[/b:1zy5cey6]
[i:1zy5cey6]Sir Kevin Sinfield[/i:1zy5cey6]:27794.gif |
|
| I can recall Barrie McDermott receiving a five game ban for a brawl in a pre season friendly against York in 1998
<i think>
Shame he ran out of friendly games to clear his ban
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 4239 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2013 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
实事求是!: |
|
| It just seems like the whole system wants to get away with doing as little as possible, while appearing to the public to be doing something.
They are pussies.
Look at the fact they've charged him with a grade b offence. Of which the definitions for punching are :
- reaction to opponent/ lashing out
- self defence
- one on one, minor
Westwoods was none of those. Not self defence, no reaction as green did nothing and you could hardly call it minor when green needed oxygen to bring him round and had it not been a grand final it would probbaly have taken him out of the game.
They're a bunch of spinless, gutless morons.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 3605 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2012 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2016 | May 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
67953_1341943970.jpg Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece
----------------------------------------------------------
[url=http://garykitchen.co.uk/:lnkxkae0]Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork[/url:lnkxkae0]
----------------------------------------------------------
[url=http://jerrychicken.wordpress.com/:lnkxkae0]JerryChicken - The Blog[/url:lnkxkae0]
----------------------------------------------------------:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_67953.jpg |
|
| Quote: The Biffs Back "I can recall Barrie McDermott receiving a five game ban for a brawl in a pre season friendly against York in 1998
<i think>
Shame he ran out of friendly games to clear his ban
Didn't he serve some of one of his bans by being loaned out to Bramley ?
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 4239 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2013 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
实事求是!: |
|
| Westwoods could also fall under another category, i found this on the RFL websiteWhen tackling or attempting to tackle makes contact with head or neck of an opponent
[iA-B Careless - flat hand off balance
A-B Careless -ball carrier dips
A-B Careless - stepped and reaching
A-B Careless - initial contact with ball or chest
A-B Careless - second tackler in - wrapping tackle up
Reckless
B-C Reckless - tackler in control
B-C Reckless - tried to tackle but reckless about outcome
Intentional
D-F Intentional - clenched fist - intent to make contact with head[/i
How is westwood's not the bottom one, grade D-F? Is that too may games for the RFL to give him? afterall they wouldn't want him to miss too much world cup would they?
What's his record like this season?
[iYay! Let's charge him with a grade b, he can early guilty plea and get no games. We look like we've done something, but he won't miss any games...easy option WIN WIN![/i
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 6881 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2021 | Aug 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
6553.gif [b:1e1swnry]Fat Boy wrote:[/b:1e1swnry] Bradford are now officially the RFL's biatches.
[b:1e1swnry]Seventies red wrote:[/b:1e1swnry] Whats a biatch?.
[b:1e1swnry]gulfcoast_highwayman wrote:[/b:1e1swnry] They wear red and white and cry a lot in October.:6553.gif |
|
| Quote: FlexWheeler "Westwoods could also fall under another category, i found this on the RFL websiteWhen tackling or attempting to tackle makes contact with head or neck of an opponent
[iA-B Careless - flat hand off balance
A-B Careless -ball carrier dips
A-B Careless - stepped and reaching
A-B Careless - initial contact with ball or chest
A-B Careless - second tackler in - wrapping tackle up
Reckless
B-C Reckless - tackler in control
B-C Reckless - tried to tackle but reckless about outcome
Intentional
D-F Intentional - clenched fist - intent to make contact with head[/i
How is westwood's not the bottom one, grade D-F? Is that too may games for the RFL to give him? afterall they wouldn't want him to miss too much world cup would they?
What's his record like this season?
[iYay! Let's charge him with a grade b, he can early guilty plea and get no games. We look like we've done something, but he won't miss any games...easy option WIN WIN![/i'"
Never got that, the tackler goes to make a legal tackle, the ball carrier dips into it at the last, catching his head, tackler is careless.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1814 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Jun 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
26414.jpg *Insert witty banter type comment*:26414.jpg |
|
| What I don't get is why we aren't using video technology in these instances. It was clear what had happened on the field and the video ref could have made the call. We use the video ref for foul play in the act of scoring, for drop out decisions and 40-20s why can't we use them for foul play? It wouldn't take long to look at the incident. Besides the clock was stopped due to the injury and it's very rare a rugby player stays down when not injured
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 24 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2013 | Nov 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
64048_1318239601.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_64048.jpg |
|
| Sort of got me thinking, if I was in charge of a major TV company wouldn't it benefit me if the match wasn't spoiled by a sending off and possible one sided match?
Sort of got me thinking, if I were a major sporting governing body in thrall to a major TV company wouldn't it be convenient if we were to allow an offending player to say on the pitch after a possible sending off offence so that we didn't endanger our product?
Sort of got me thinking, wouldn't it be better for all concerned if the TV matches could stay as competitive as possible for as long as possible and the authorities could be seen to be dealing out justice after the event?
Just thinking out loud . . . . .
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 55 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2015 | Apr 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
49882_1376599203.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_49882.jpg |
|
| Friendlies should never count in the Match bans; what a ridiculous rule!
Why should a player be allowed to partake in a red-card/ban offence and stay on the pitch, thus giving the offending team an advantage (Especially if the attack has meant a player goes off injured), for that team to then be allowed to lose nothing in the competition? If it were feasible in any way, I'd argue the ban should be served in the next game against the team they wronged, though I recognise that wouldn't be easy to organise.
Of course, referee's could use the video referee and their backbone to award red cards when needed, but we all know that won't happen any time soon.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2768 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
23350_1468449137.jpg [quote="roger daly":1a7cbd66]Oh dear, I believe you would be classed as s[sic] typical Wigan fan[/quote:1a7cbd66]
[quote="wrencat1873":1a7cbd66]It's the mighty Wigan, they can do whatever they want.[/quote:1a7cbd66]
[quote="Big lads mate":1a7cbd66]you arrogant pot prick[/quote:1a7cbd66]
[quote="Tricky2309":1a7cbd66]Look prick do one[/quote:1a7cbd66]
[quote="Willzay":1a7cbd66]you cocky pie eating c*nt.[/quote:1a7cbd66]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_23350.jpg |
|
| Quote: NormallyJustRead "Sort of got me thinking, if I was in charge of a major TV company wouldn't it benefit me if the match wasn't spoiled by a sending off and possible one sided match?
Sort of got me thinking, if I were a major sporting governing body in thrall to a major TV company wouldn't it be convenient if we were to allow an offending player to say on the pitch after a possible sending off offence so that we didn't endanger our product?
Sort of got me thinking, wouldn't it be better for all concerned if the TV matches could stay as competitive as possible for as long as possible and the authorities could be seen to be dealing out justice after the event?
Just thinking out loud . . . . .'"
I've totally bought into that conspiracy theory.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 11412 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2021 | Jul 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
"The Golden Generation finally has its Golden Fleece! They have Wembley Cup Final winners medals to add to their collection."
23/08/2014: |
|
| Westwood "I didn't know that I had punched him".
Yep that sounds like a good enough excuse.
|
|
|
|
|
|